Exposure to low dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening and risk of cancer: secondary analysis of trial data and risk-benefit analysis
- PMID: 28179230
- PMCID: PMC5421449
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j347
Exposure to low dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening and risk of cancer: secondary analysis of trial data and risk-benefit analysis
Abstract
Objective To estimate the cumulative radiation exposure and lifetime attributable risk of cancer incidence associated with lung cancer screening using annual low dose computed tomography (CT).Design Secondary analysis of data from a lung cancer screening trial and risk-benefit analysis.Setting 10 year, non-randomised, single centre, low dose CT, lung cancer screening trial (COSMOS study) which took place in Milan, Italy in 2004-15 (enrolment in 2004-05). Secondary analysis took place in 2015-16.Participants High risk asymptomatic smokers aged 50 and older, who were current or former smokers (≥20 pack years), and had no history of cancer in the previous five years.Main outcome measures Cumulative radiation exposure from low dose CT and positron emission tomography (PET) CT scans, calculated by dosimetry software; and lifetime attributable risk of cancer incidence, calculated from the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII (BEIR VII) report.Results Over 10 years, 5203 participants (3439 men, 1764 women) underwent 42 228 low dose CT and 635 PET CT scans. The median cumulative effective dose at the 10th year of screening was 9.3 mSv for men and 13.0 mSv for women. According to participants' age and sex, the lifetime attributable risk of lung cancer and major cancers after 10 years of CT screening ranged from 5.5 to 1.4 per 10 000 people screened, and from 8.1 to 2.6 per 10 000 people screened, respectively. In women aged 50-54, the lifetime attributable risk of lung cancer and major cancers was about fourfold and threefold higher than for men aged 65 and older, respectively. The numbers of lung cancer and major cancer cases induced by 10 years of screening in our cohort were 1.5 and 2.4, respectively, which corresponded to an additional risk of induced major cancers of 0.05% (2.4/5203). 259 lung cancers were diagnosed in 10 years of screening; one radiation induced major cancer would be expected for every 108 (259/2.4) lung cancers detected through screening.Conclusion Radiation exposure and cancer risk from low dose CT screening for lung cancer, even if non-negligible, can be considered acceptable in light of the substantial mortality reduction associated with screening.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at
Figures
Comment in
-
Lung cancer screening with low dose CT and radiation harm-from prediction models to cancer incidence data.Ann Transl Med. 2017 Sep;5(17):360. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.06.41. Ann Transl Med. 2017. PMID: 28936454 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Radiation Risks in Lung Cancer Screening Programs.Chest. 2014 Mar;145(3):618-624. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-1420. Chest. 2014. PMID: 27845636
-
Radiation risks in lung cancer screening programs: a comparison with nuclear industry workers and atomic bomb survivors.Chest. 2014 Mar 1;145(3):618-24. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-1420. Chest. 2014. PMID: 24590022
-
Radiation burden and associated cancer risk for a typical population to be screened for lung cancer with low-dose CT: A phantom study.Eur Radiol. 2018 Oct;28(10):4370-4378. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5373-7. Epub 2018 Apr 12. Eur Radiol. 2018. PMID: 29651767
-
Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies.Radiology. 2010 Oct;257(1):246-53. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100570. Epub 2010 Aug 24. Radiology. 2010. PMID: 20736332 Review.
-
Estimating risk associated with radiation exposure during follow-up after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR).J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2010 Feb;51(1):95-104. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2010. PMID: 20081765 Review.
Cited by
-
Interpretable machine learning model for digital lung cancer prescreening in Chinese populations with missing data.NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Nov 19;7(1):327. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01309-z. NPJ Digit Med. 2024. PMID: 39562681 Free PMC article.
-
Development and validation of a tumor marker-based model for the prediction of lung cancer: an analysis of a multicenter retrospective study in Shanghai, China.Front Oncol. 2024 Oct 31;14:1427170. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1427170. eCollection 2024. Front Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39544305 Free PMC article.
-
Current Evidence for a Lung Cancer Screening Program.Port J Public Health. 2024 Apr 22;42(2):133-158. doi: 10.1159/000538434. eCollection 2024 Aug. Port J Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39469231 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Long Term Evaluation of Quantitative Cumulative Irradiation in Patients Suffering from ILDs.Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Sep 26;14(19):2136. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14192136. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39410540 Free PMC article.
-
Speed and efficiency: evaluating pulmonary nodule detection with AI-enhanced 3D gradient echo imaging.Eur Radiol. 2024 Aug 18. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11027-5. Online ahead of print. Eur Radiol. 2024. PMID: 39154315
References
-
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 2015;65:5-29. 10.3322/caac.21254 pmid:25559415. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, et al. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 2011;365:395-409. 10.1056/NEJMoa1102873 pmid:21714641. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Decision memo for screening for lung cancer with low dose computed tomography (LDCT). (CAG-00439N). 2015. https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/nca-decision-memo....
-
- National Research Council. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII—phase 2.National Academies Press, 2006. - PubMed
-
- Hendee WR, O’Connor MK. Radiation risks of medical imaging: separating fact from fantasy. Radiology 2012;264:312-21. 10.1148/radiol.12112678 pmid:22821690. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical