Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr;90(1072):20160790.
doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160790. Epub 2017 Feb 9.

Dose escalation study with respiratory-gated carbon-ion scanning radiotherapy using a simultaneous integrated boost for pancreatic cancer: simulation with four-dimensional computed tomography

Affiliations

Dose escalation study with respiratory-gated carbon-ion scanning radiotherapy using a simultaneous integrated boost for pancreatic cancer: simulation with four-dimensional computed tomography

Shohei Kawashiro et al. Br J Radiol. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: Pancreatic cancer is a difficult to treat disease with a persistently high mortality rate. We evaluated dose distribution simulation with respiratory-gated carbon-ion pencil beam scanning (C-PBS) with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to increase tumour dose, sparing organs at risk (OARs).

Methods: Using four-dimensional CT data of 12 patients, we delineated gross tumour volume and two clinical target volumes (CTVs). To consider beam range intrafractional uncertainty, we calculated field-specific target volumes, from which two planning target volumes (PTVs) were generated. PTV1 would receive a planned dose of 55.2 Gy [relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-weighted absorbed dose] in 12 fractions, and PTV2 would receive an SIB dose up to 67.2 Gy (RBE). Dose assessments were conducted with regard to the targets and OARs.

Results: CTV2 dose covering 95% of the volume (D95%) increased from 50.3 ± 5.1 Gy (RBE) to 62.5 ± 3.5 Gy (RBE) for a planned dose from 55.2 Gy (RBE) to 67.2 Gy (RBE). For 4 of 12 patients with a distance of ≥5 mm between the tumour and the gastrointestinal tract, CTV2 D95% was ≥95% of planned dose at all dose levels.

Conclusion: We quantified dose escalation with respiratory-gated C-PBS using SIB for pancreatic cancer and revealed that OAR dose was not affected to the same degree as the tumour dose. Advances in knowledge: A simulation study on respiratory-gated C-PBS with SIB for pancreatic cancer was performed. The results indicated the feasibility of dose escalation for pancreatic cancer, which should be confirmed in clinical trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Mean dosimetry at each prescribed dose level. CTV, clinical target volume; D1D2, first and second portions of the duodenum; D3D4, third and fourth portions of the duodenum; GTV, gross tumour volume.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Dosimetry by tumour location: (a) dose covering 95% of the volume (D95%) of the gross tumour volume (GTV), clinical target volume (CTV)1 and CTV2; (b) the minimum dose received by the most exposed 2 cc volume of the organ (D2 cc) of the stomach, first and second portions of the duodenum (D1D2) and third and fourth portions of the duodenum (D3D4) averaged over the patients. RBE, relative biological effectiveness.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Plot of clinical target volume (CTV)2 dose covering 95% of the volume (D95%) corresponding to the distance between the tumour and the digestive tract. RBE, relative biological effectiveness
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
A representative case of respiratory-gated carbon-ion pencil beam scanning irradiation with a simultaneous integrated boost dose of 67.2 Gy [relative biological effectiveness (RBE)]: (a, b) axial and coronal images of dose distribution, respectively; and (c) a dose–volume histogram for this treatment plan. CTV, clinical target volume; GTV, gross tumour volume.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jernal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 2015; 65: 5–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21254 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sener SF, Fremgen A, Menck HR, Winchester DP. Pancreatic cancer: a report of treatment and survival trends for 100,313 patients diagnosed from 1985–1995, using the National Cancer Database. J Am Coll Surg 1999; 189: 1–7. - PubMed
    1. Crane CH, Varadhachary G, Settle SH, Fleming JB, Evans DB, Wolff RA. The integration of chemoradiation in the care of patient with localized pancreatic cancer. Cancer Radiother 2009; 13: 123–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canrad.2008.11.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ishii H, Furuse J, Boku N, Okusaka T, Ikeda M, Ohkawa S, et al. . Phase II study of gemcitabine chemotherapy alone for locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma: JCOG0506. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2010; 40: 573–79. - PubMed
    1. Brown MW, Ning H, Arora B, Albert PS, Poggi M, Camphausen K, et al. . A dosimetric analysis of dose escalation using two intensity-modulated radiation therapy techniques in locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006; 65: 274–83. - PubMed