Purpose: To evaluate the usefulness and safety of endovascular treatments for acute upper limb ischemia (AULI) by using multiple techniques, and to compare catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) and percutaneous aspiration thromboembolectomy (PAT) as initial procedures.
Materials and methods: The study included 18 patients (4 men and 14 women) with AULI, who underwent a total of 20 sessions of endovascular treatment using various endovascular techniques between January 2005 and April 2016. The patients were initially treated with CDT [n = 9, CDT-based group (C-G)], PAT [n = 6, PAT-based group (P-G)], or angioplasty (n = 3). In case of residual emboli, we performed additional endovascular techniques. We assessed technical success, clinical success, and complications. Additionally, we compared the urokinase dosage between the groups.
Results: The mean patient age was 74.4 years. Technical and clinical success was obtained in all patients. Among the 18 patients, 1 underwent CDT only, 2 underwent PAT only, 1 underwent angioplasty only, and 14 underwent multiple techniques. Two patients from the C-G experienced major complications (cerebellar hemorrhage 1; pseudo-aneurysm in a branch of the ulnar artery 1). The mean urokinase dosage was lower in the P-G than in the C-G (40,000 vs. 246,667 IU; Mann-Whitney U test, P = 0.004).
Conclusion: Endovascular treatment is effective and safe for AULI. A combination of multiple endovascular techniques is important for successful treatment. PAT is suggested as an initial procedure among endovascular techniques, in terms of a lower dosage of urokinase and a lower complication rate.
Level of evidence: IV, Case-control studies.
Keywords: Acute upper limb ischemia; Catheter-directed thrombolysis; Endovascular treatment; Percutaneous aspiration thromboembolectomy.