Assessing the Risks Associated with MRI in Patients with a Pacemaker or Defibrillator
- PMID: 28225684
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1603265
Assessing the Risks Associated with MRI in Patients with a Pacemaker or Defibrillator
Abstract
Background: The presence of a cardiovascular implantable electronic device has long been a contraindication for the performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We established a prospective registry to determine the risks associated with MRI at a magnetic field strength of 1.5 tesla for patients who had a pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) that was "non-MRI-conditional" (i.e., not approved by the Food and Drug Administration for MRI scanning).
Methods: Patients in the registry were referred for clinically indicated nonthoracic MRI at a field strength of 1.5 tesla. Devices were interrogated before and after MRI with the use of a standardized protocol and were appropriately reprogrammed before the scanning. The primary end points were death, generator or lead failure, induced arrhythmia, loss of capture, or electrical reset during the scanning. The secondary end points were changes in device settings.
Results: MRI was performed in 1000 cases in which patients had a pacemaker and in 500 cases in which patients had an ICD. No deaths, lead failures, losses of capture, or ventricular arrhythmias occurred during MRI. One ICD generator could not be interrogated after MRI and required immediate replacement; the device had not been appropriately programmed per protocol before the MRI. We observed six cases of self-terminating atrial fibrillation or flutter and six cases of partial electrical reset. Changes in lead impedance, pacing threshold, battery voltage, and P-wave and R-wave amplitude exceeded prespecified thresholds in a small number of cases. Repeat MRI was not associated with an increase in adverse events.
Conclusions: In this study, device or lead failure did not occur in any patient with a non-MRI-conditional pacemaker or ICD who underwent clinically indicated nonthoracic MRI at 1.5 tesla, was appropriately screened, and had the device reprogrammed in accordance with the prespecified protocol. (Funded by St. Jude Medical and others; MagnaSafe ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00907361 .).
Comment in
-
Risks of MRI in Patients with a Pacemaker or Defibrillator.N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 22;376(25):2495. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1704179. N Engl J Med. 2017. PMID: 28639785 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Determining the risks of clinically indicated nonthoracic magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T for patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: rationale and design of the MagnaSafe Registry.Am Heart J. 2013 Mar;165(3):266-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.12.004. Epub 2013 Jan 28. Am Heart J. 2013. PMID: 23453091
-
Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Cardiac Devices.N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 28;377(26):2555-2564. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1604267. N Engl J Med. 2017. PMID: 29281579 Free PMC article.
-
Determining the risks of magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 tesla for patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators.Am J Cardiol. 2012 Dec 1;110(11):1631-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.07.030. Epub 2012 Aug 23. Am J Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 22921995
-
Implications of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators in urological practice.J Urol. 2011 Oct;186(4):1198-205. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.2697. Epub 2011 Aug 16. J Urol. 2011. PMID: 21849189 Review.
-
[Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: a systematic review].Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2010 Aug;59(4):221-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ancard.2009.04.003. Epub 2009 May 14. Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2010. PMID: 19962691 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Magnetic resonance-conditional cardiac implantable electronic devices: an Italian perspective on the prevalence of mixed-brand systems over time.Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 6;14(1):27006. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73403-x. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39505923 Free PMC article.
-
Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Oct 8;11(10):313. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11100313. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024. PMID: 39452284 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of Tricuspid Regurgitation by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Current Role and Future Applications.J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 31;13(15):4481. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154481. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39124748 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Electrophysiological Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (EP-CMR)-Guided Interventional Procedures: Challenges and Opportunities.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2024 Sep;26(9):903-910. doi: 10.1007/s11886-024-02092-9. Epub 2024 Jul 18. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2024. PMID: 39023800 Review.
-
MRI in Patients with Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices and Fractured or Abandoned Leads.Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2024 Jun;6(3):e230303. doi: 10.1148/ryct.230303. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2024. PMID: 38869431 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical