An international multicenter study evaluating the clinical efficacy and safety of per-oral endoscopic myotomy in octogenarians
- PMID: 28235595
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.02.007
An international multicenter study evaluating the clinical efficacy and safety of per-oral endoscopic myotomy in octogenarians
Abstract
Background and aims: Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia is particularly appealing in the elderly because it is minimally invasive. However, data in patients aged ≥80 years are scarce. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcome of POEM in octogenarians.
Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective study at 8 centers. Consecutive octogenarians with achalasia who underwent POEM between 2010 and 2016 were included. Rates of technical success (completion of myotomy), clinical response (Eckardt score ≤3), and adverse events (severity graded as per American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy lexicon) were assessed.
Results: A total of 76 patients (47.4% female, mean age 84 years) underwent POEM for treatment of achalasia: type I, 17.1%; type II, 35.5%; type III, 17.1%; and unspecified, 30.3%. Overall, 41.1% were treatment naïve, whereas others had previous botulinum toxin injection and/or pneumatic dilation. The mean (± standard deviation [SD]) age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index score was 6.2 ± 2.4, with the majority of patients having American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System (ASA) scores of II/III. Technical success was 93.4%, with a median follow-up of 256 days. Fourteen adverse events occurred in 11 patients (14.5%). There were 3 inadvertent mucosotomies, 6 cases of symptomatic capnoperitoneum and/or capnomediastinum, 2 esophageal leaks, 1 cardiac arrhythmia, and 2 other). The severities of these adverse events were mild (78.6%), moderate (14.3%), and severe (7.1%). Clinical success was achieved in 90.8% of patients, with a mean (± SD) Eckardt score reduction from 7.0 ± 2.3 to 0.8 ± 0.1 (P < .001), a median follow-up of 256 days, and interquartile range of 66 to 547.
Conclusion: Although the rate of technical success may be somewhat lower and the rate of adverse events slightly higher than previously reported, our data suggest that POEM in octogenarians is safe and effective, supporting its role as a primary modality for achalasia in this patient population.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Per-oral endoscopic myotomy in patients with or without prior Heller's myotomy: comparing long-term outcomes in a large U.S. single-center cohort (with videos).Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Apr;87(4):972-985. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.10.039. Epub 2017 Nov 6. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018. PMID: 29122601
-
A multicenter international registry of redo per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) after failed POEM.Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jun;85(6):1208-1211. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.10.015. Epub 2016 Oct 15. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017. PMID: 27756611
-
Efficacy and Safety of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Treatment of Achalasia After Failed Heller Myotomy.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Oct;15(10):1531-1537.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.01.031. Epub 2017 Feb 9. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017. PMID: 28189695
-
Is POEM the Answer for Management of Spastic Esophageal Disorders? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Jan;62(1):35-44. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4373-1. Epub 2016 Nov 17. Dig Dis Sci. 2017. PMID: 27858325 Review.
-
Comparative efficacy of per-oral endoscopic myotomy and Heller myotomy in patients with achalasia: a meta-analysis.Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Oct;90(4):546-558.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.05.046. Epub 2019 Jun 10. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019. PMID: 31443929 Review.
Cited by
-
Safety and efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy for treating achalasia in pediatric and geriatric patients: A meta-analysis.World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Oct 16;16(10):566-580. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i10.566. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2024. PMID: 39473543 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical and per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for the treatment of primary esophageal motility disorders: A systematic analysis of current trends in Germany between 2011 and 2019.PLoS One. 2024 Jan 23;19(1):e0297265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297265. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38261581 Free PMC article.
-
Impedance planimetry during per-oral endoscopic myotomy is associated with decreased inadvertent capnoperitoneum.Surg Endosc. 2024 Jan;38(1):280-290. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10526-8. Epub 2023 Nov 21. Surg Endosc. 2024. PMID: 37989889
-
Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Achalasia in Older Adults: A Retrospective Analysis of 39 Cases with a Minimum Follow-Up of 5 Years.Dysphagia. 2023 Oct;38(5):1286-1294. doi: 10.1007/s00455-023-10554-5. Epub 2023 Feb 1. Dysphagia. 2023. PMID: 36725760
-
Peroral endoscopic myotomy: is it better to perform it in naive patients or as second-line therapy? Results of an open-label-controlled study in 105 patients.Surg Endosc. 2023 May;37(5):3760-3768. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08767-6. Epub 2023 Jan 20. Surg Endosc. 2023. PMID: 36670217 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
