Deep brain stimulation of the subcallosal cingulate for treatment-refractory anorexia nervosa: 1 year follow-up of an open-label trial
- PMID: 28238701
- DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30076-7
Deep brain stimulation of the subcallosal cingulate for treatment-refractory anorexia nervosa: 1 year follow-up of an open-label trial
Abstract
Background: Anorexia nervosa is a life-threatening illness. Brain circuits believed to drive anorexia nervosa symptoms can be accessed with surgical techniques such as deep brain stimulation (DBS). Initial results suggest that DBS of the subcallosal cingulate is safe and associated with improvements in mood and anxiety. Here, we investigated the safety, clinical, and neuroimaging outcomes of DBS of the subcallosal cingulate in a group of patients during 12 months of active stimulation.
Methods: We did this prospective open-label trial at the Department of Surgery of the University of Toronto (Toronto, ON, Canada). Patients were eligible to participate if they were aged 20-60 years and had a diagnosis of anorexia nervosa (restricting or binge-purging subtype) and a demonstrated history of chronicity or treatment resistance. Following a period of medical stabilisation, patients underwent surgery for DBS and received open-label continuous stimulation for the entire 1 year study duration. The primary outcome was safety and acceptability of the procedure. The secondary outcomes were body-mass index (BMI), mood, anxiety, affective regulation, and anorexia nervosa-specific behaviours at 12 months after surgery, as well as changes in neural circuitry (measured with PET imaging of cerebral glucose metabolism at baseline and at 6 and 12 months after surgery). This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01476540.
Findings: 16 patients with treatment-refractory anorexia nervosa were enrolled between September, 2011, and January, 2014, and underwent DBS of the subcallosal cingulate between November, 2011, and April, 2014. Patients had a mean age of 34 years (SD 8) and average illness duration of 18 years (SD 6). Two patients requested that their devices be removed or deactivated during the study, although their reasons for doing so were poorly defined. The most common adverse event was pain related to surgical incision or positioning that required oral analgesics for longer than 3-4 days after surgery (five [31%] of 16 patients). Seven (44%) of 16 patients had serious adverse events, most of which were related to the underlying illness, including electrolyte disturbances. Average BMI at surgery was 13·83 (SD 1·49) and 14 (88%) of the 16 patients had comorbid mood disorders, anxiety disorders, or both. Mean BMI after 12 months of stimulation was 17·34 (SD 3·40; p=0·0009 vs baseline). DBS was associated with significant improvements in measures of depression (mean Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores 19·40 [SD 6·76] at baseline vs 8·79 [7·64] at 12 months; p=0·00015), anxiety (mean Beck Anxiety Inventory score 38·00 [15·55] vs 27·14 [18·39]; p=0·035), and affective regulation (mean Dysfunction in Emotional Regulation Scale score 131·80 [22·04] vs 104·36 [31·27]; p=0·019). We detected significant changes in cerebral glucose metabolism in key anorexia nervosa-related structures at both 6 months and 12 months of ongoing brain stimulation.
Interpretation: In patients with chronic treatment-refractory anorexia nervosa, DBS is well tolerated and is associated with significant and sustained improvements in affective symptoms, BMI, and changes in neural circuitry at 12 months after surgery.
Funding: Klarman Family Foundation Grants Program in Eating Disorders Research and Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Changing the brain to treat anorexia nervosa.Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;4(4):262-263. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30074-3. Epub 2017 Feb 24. Lancet Psychiatry. 2017. PMID: 28238702 No abstract available.
-
Ethical surgical placebo-controlled trials of deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant anorexia nervosa.Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;4(6):441-442. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30154-2. Lancet Psychiatry. 2017. PMID: 28554427 No abstract available.
-
Ethical surgical placebo-controlled trials of deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant anorexia nervosa - Authors' reply.Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;4(6):442. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30201-8. Lancet Psychiatry. 2017. PMID: 28554428 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-refractory anorexia nervosa: a phase 1 pilot trial.Lancet. 2013 Apr 20;381(9875):1361-1370. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62188-6. Epub 2013 Mar 7. Lancet. 2013. PMID: 23473846 Clinical Trial.
-
Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens for treatment-refractory anorexia nervosa: A long-term follow-up study.Brain Stimul. 2020 May-Jun;13(3):643-649. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Feb 6. Brain Stimul. 2020. PMID: 32289691
-
Cognitive and quality-of-life related factors of body mass index (BMI) improvement after deep brain stimulation in the subcallosal cingulate and nucleus accumbens in treatment-refractory chronic anorexia nervosa.Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2022 Jul;30(4):353-363. doi: 10.1002/erv.2895. Epub 2022 Mar 23. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2022. PMID: 35322504
-
Deep-brain stimulation for anorexia nervosa.World Neurosurg. 2013 Sep-Oct;80(3-4):S29.e1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.06.039. Epub 2012 Jun 25. World Neurosurg. 2013. PMID: 22743198 Review.
-
Effectiveness of Deep Brain Stimulation in Treatment of Anorexia Nervosa and Obesity: A Systematic Review.World Neurosurg. 2022 Dec;168:179-189. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.09.114. Epub 2022 Oct 1. World Neurosurg. 2022. PMID: 36191890 Review.
Cited by
-
Structural connectivity modifications following deep brain stimulation of the subcallosal cingulate and nucleus accumbens in severe anorexia nervosa.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Sep 12;166(1):364. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06258-w. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024. PMID: 39261306
-
Clinical and scientific review of severe and enduring anorexia nervosa in intensive care settings: introducing an innovative treatment paradigm.J Eat Disord. 2024 Sep 3;12(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s40337-024-01079-9. J Eat Disord. 2024. PMID: 39227928 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effects of cognitive behavioural therapy and exposure-response prevention on brain activation in obsessive-compulsive disorder patients: systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2024 Jun 27. doi: 10.1007/s00406-024-01852-6. Online ahead of print. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 38935215
-
Deep brain stimulation for psychiatric disorders: role of imaging in identifying/confirming DBS targets, predicting, and optimizing outcome and unravelling mechanisms of action.Psychoradiology. 2021 Oct 4;1(3):118-151. doi: 10.1093/psyrad/kkab012. eCollection 2021 Sep. Psychoradiology. 2021. PMID: 38665808 Free PMC article.
-
Severe enduring anorexia nervosa (SE-AN) treatment options and their effectiveness: a review of literature.J Eat Disord. 2024 Apr 23;12(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s40337-024-01006-y. J Eat Disord. 2024. PMID: 38654374 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
