Prospective validation of a clinical decision rule to identify patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain who can safely be removed from cardiac monitoring
- PMID: 28246315
- PMCID: PMC5266567
- DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.160742
Prospective validation of a clinical decision rule to identify patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain who can safely be removed from cardiac monitoring
Abstract
Background: Most patients with chest pain in the emergency department are assigned to cardiac monitoring for several hours, blocking access for patients in greater need. We sought to validate a previously derived decision rule for safe removal of patients from cardiac monitoring after initial evaluation in the emergency department.
Methods: We prospectively enrolled adults (age ≥ 18 yr) who presented with chest pain and were assigned to cardiac monitoring at 2 academic emergency departments over 18 months. We collected standardized baseline characteristics, findings from clinical evaluations and predictors for the Ottawa Chest Pain Cardiac Monitoring Rule: whether the patient is currently free of chest pain, and whether the electrocardiogram is normal or shows only nonspecific changes. The outcome was an arrhythmia requiring intervention in the emergency department or within 8 hours of presentation to the emergency department. We calculated diagnostic characteristics for the clinical prediction rule.
Results: We included 796 patients (mean age 63.8 yr, 55.8% male, 8.9% admitted to hospital). Fifteen patients (1.9%) had an arrhythmia, and the rule performed with the following characteristics: sensitivity 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] 78.2%-100%) and specificity 36.4% (95% CI 33.0%-39.6%). Application of the Ottawa Chest Pain Cardiac Monitoring Rule would have allowed 284 out of 796 patients (35.7%) to be safely removed from cardiac monitoring.
Interpretation: We successfully validated the decision rule for safe removal of a large subset of patients with chest pain from cardiac monitoring after initial evaluation in the emergency department. Implementation of this simple yet highly sensitive rule will allow for improved use of health care resources.
© 2017 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A clinical decision rule to identify which chest pain patients can safely be removed from cardiac monitoring in the emergency department.Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Aug;50(2):136-43. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.02.004. Epub 2007 May 11. Ann Emerg Med. 2007. PMID: 17498844
-
A study to derive a clinical decision rule for triage of emergency department patients with chest pain: design and methodology.BMC Emerg Med. 2008 Feb 6;8:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-8-3. BMC Emerg Med. 2008. PMID: 18254973 Free PMC article.
-
Development and validation of a prediction rule for early discharge of low-risk emergency department patients with potential ischemic chest pain.CJEM. 2014 Mar;16(2):106-19. doi: 10.2310/8000.2013.130938. CJEM. 2014. PMID: 24626115
-
[Is a more efficient operative strategy feasible for the emergency management of the patient with acute chest pain?].Ital Heart J Suppl. 2000 Feb;1(2):186-201. Ital Heart J Suppl. 2000. PMID: 10731376 Review. Italian.
-
San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict short-term serious outcomes: a systematic review.CMAJ. 2011 Oct 18;183(15):E1116-26. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.101326. Epub 2011 Sep 26. CMAJ. 2011. PMID: 21948723 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Received care compared to ADP-guided care of patients admitted to hospital with chest pain of possible cardiac origin.Int J Gen Med. 2018 Sep 3;11:345-351. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S166570. eCollection 2018. Int J Gen Med. 2018. PMID: 30214268 Free PMC article.
-
Real-Time Emergency Department Electronic Notifications Regarding High-Risk Patients: A Systematic Review.Telemed J E Health. 2019 Jul;25(7):604-618. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0117. Epub 2018 Aug 21. Telemed J E Health. 2019. PMID: 30129886 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Niska R, Bhuiya F, Xu J. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2007 emergency department summary. Natl Health Stat Report 2010;6:1–31. - PubMed
-
- Amsterdam EA, Kirk JD, Bluemke DA, et al. ; American Heart Association Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, and Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Testing of low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2010;122:1756–76. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. ACC/AHA Task Force Members; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines [published erratum Circulation 2014;130:e431–2]. Circulation 2014;130:2354–94. - PubMed
-
- Atzema C, Schull MJ, Borgundvaag B, et al. ALARMED: adverse events in low-risk patients with chest pain receiving continuous electrocardiographic monitoring in the emergency department. A pilot study. Am J Emerg Med 2006; 24:62–7. - PubMed
-
- Singer AJ, Visram F, Shembekar A, et al. Telemetry monitoring during transport of low-risk chest pain patients from the emergency department: is it necessary? Acad Emerg Med 2005; 12:965–9. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical