Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy: Current Perspectives and Future Directions
- PMID: 28247327
- DOI: 10.1007/s11934-017-0672-0
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy: Current Perspectives and Future Directions
Abstract
Purpose of review: Since its introduction, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) has undergone a variety of changes; however, it remains one of the most utilized treatment modalities for urolithiasis. The goal of this review is to provide the practicing urologist an update on contemporary trends, new technologies, and related controversies in utilizing ESWL for stone treatment.
Recent findings: ESWL use has come under scrutiny with a shift in focus to cost-effectiveness and healthcare outcomes. Fortunately, advances in lithotripter technology have spawned several generations of devices that strive to improve stone-free rates and decrease complications. Most of all, a focus on patient selection criteria has helped improve procedural success. Years of experience utilizing ESWL for stone treatment have helped urologists better optimize its use and minimize complications. Improvements in technique along with more stringent patient and stone selection have helped ESWL remain a mainstay in the treatment of stone disease.
Keywords: ESWL; Lithotripter; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Ureteroscopy; Urinary tract stones; Urolithiasis.
Similar articles
-
Treatment selection for urolithiasis: percutaneous nephrolithomy, ureteroscopy, shock wave lithotripsy, and active monitoring.World J Urol. 2017 Sep;35(9):1395-1399. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2030-8. Epub 2017 Mar 16. World J Urol. 2017. PMID: 28303335 Review.
-
The management of paediatric urolithiasis.BJU Int. 2000 Nov;86(7):857-60. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00909.x. BJU Int. 2000. PMID: 11069414
-
[Current status of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in urinary lithiasis.].Arch Esp Urol. 2017 Mar;70(2):263-287. Arch Esp Urol. 2017. PMID: 28300033 Review. Spanish.
-
Treatment alternatives for urinary system stone disease in preschool aged children: results of 616 cases.J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Feb;11(1):34.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.11.010. Epub 2015 Feb 3. J Pediatr Urol. 2015. PMID: 25697981
-
Meta-analysis of Optimal Management of Lower Pole Stone of 10 - 20 mm: Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy (PCNL).Acta Med Indones. 2018 Jan;50(1):18-25. Acta Med Indones. 2018. PMID: 29686172
Cited by
-
The efficacy of early extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for the treatment of 5 to 10 mm upper ureteral stones: An observational study.Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jul 26;103(30):e39103. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039103. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024. PMID: 39058849 Free PMC article.
-
Predictive markers for infections after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in patients with kidney stone based on a large prospective cohort.World J Urol. 2024 Jan 30;42(1):63. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04769-w. World J Urol. 2024. PMID: 38289424
-
Prospective comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in distal ureteral stones.Urolithiasis. 2023 Jun 5;51(1):86. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01460-4. Urolithiasis. 2023. PMID: 37272997
-
Efficacy of emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteral stones: a meta-analysis.BMC Urol. 2023 Apr 4;23(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01226-5. BMC Urol. 2023. PMID: 37016405 Free PMC article.
-
Bowel Perforation after Extracorporeal Wave Lithotripsy: A Review of the Literature.J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 29;12(3):1052. doi: 10.3390/jcm12031052. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 36769699 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
