Comparison of the efficiency of irrigation of single and double-needle techniques of temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis: A cadaver study

Cranio. 2017 Nov;35(6):405-409. doi: 10.1080/08869634.2017.1279825. Epub 2017 Mar 1.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of the double- and single-needle arthrocentesis techniques in removing methylene blue from the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) space.

Methods: This study was performed in 20 TMJs from 10 fresh cadavers. A total of 1 ml of 10 μM methylene blue solution was injected into the upper joint spaces, just prior to irrigation. Ten arthrocentesis procedures were carried out using the double-needle technique, and the remaining 10 were completed using the single-needle technique. The photo-absorbance values of methylene blue solution injected into and removed from the joint space were measured at a 665 nm wavelength. Statistical analysis was performed using Shapiro-Wilks test and t-test.

Results: The t-test analysis showed no statistically significant difference between the two methods in the removal of methylene blue.

Conclusion: According to the results of the present study, the single-needle technique may be a good alternative with the advantages of easier application in cases where it is not possible to perform the double-needle technique.

Keywords: TMJ arthrocentesis; arthrocentesis; double-needle technique; methylene blue; single-needle technique.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Arthrocentesis / instrumentation
  • Arthrocentesis / methods*
  • Cadaver
  • Humans
  • Methylene Blue / administration & dosage*
  • Needles
  • Temporomandibular Joint Disorders / therapy*
  • Therapeutic Irrigation / instrumentation
  • Therapeutic Irrigation / methods*

Substances

  • Methylene Blue