Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2017 Mar 3;17(1):230.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4147-5.

Systematic Development and Implementation of Interventions to OPtimise Health Literacy and Access (Ophelia)

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Multicenter Study

Systematic Development and Implementation of Interventions to OPtimise Health Literacy and Access (Ophelia)

Alison Beauchamp et al. BMC Public Health. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: The need for healthcare strengthening to enhance equity is critical, requiring systematic approaches that focus on those experiencing lesser access and outcomes. This project developed and tested the Ophelia (OPtimising HEalth LIteracy and Access) approach for co-design of interventions to improve health literacy and equity of access. Eight principles guided this development: Outcomes focused; Equity driven, Needs diagnosis, Co-design, Driven by local wisdom, Sustainable, Responsive and Systematically applied. We report the application of the Ophelia process where proof-of-concept was defined as successful application of the principles.

Methods: Nine sites were briefed on the aims of the project around health literacy, co-design and quality improvement. The sites were rural/metropolitan, small/large hospitals, community health centres or municipalities. Each site identified their own priorities for improvement; collected health literacy data using the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) within the identified priority groups; engaged staff in co-design workshops to generate ideas for improvement; developed program-logic models; and implemented their projects using Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. Evaluation included assessment of impacts on organisations, practitioners and service users, and whether the principles were applied.

Results: Sites undertook co-design workshops involving discussion of service user needs informed by HLQ (n = 813) and interview data. Sites generated between 21 and 78 intervention ideas and then planned their selected interventions through program-logic models. Sites successfully implemented interventions and refined them progressively with PDSA cycles. Interventions generally involved one of four pathways: development of clinician skills and resources for health literacy, engagement of community volunteers to disseminate health promotion messages, direct impact on consumers' health literacy, and redesign of existing services. Evidence of application of the principles was found in all sites.

Conclusions: The Ophelia approach guided identification of health literacy issues at each participating site and the development and implementation of locally appropriate solutions. The eight principles provided a framework that allowed flexible application of the Ophelia approach and generation of a diverse set of interventions. Changes were observed at organisational, staff, and community member levels. The Ophelia approach can be used to generate health service improvements that enhance health outcomes and address inequity of access to healthcare.

Keywords: Chronic disease; HLQ; Health Literacy Questionnaire; Health inequities; Health literacy; Health service improvement; Healthcare access; Ophelia.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Phases of the Ophelia approach
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Example of a narrative (vignette) derived from cluster analysis and related health literacy* and demographic data
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Example of a program logic model for training community members of a national women’s organisation as health mentors for elderly clients to reduce falls and decrease social isolation
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
An integrated framework for health literacy interventions

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 16 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. World Health Organization. Sustainable development and health equity. Available at: http://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_content&view=section&layout=blog&id=13&Itemid=258&lang=en. Accessed 1 Oct 2016.
    1. Tangcharoensathien V, Mills A, Palu T. Accelerating health equity: the key role of universal health coverage in the Sustainable Development Goals. BMC Med. 2015;13(1):1–5. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0342-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vos T, Barber RM, Bell B, Bertozzi-Villa A, Biryukov S, Bolliger I, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 2013;386(9995):743–800. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Elgar FJ, Pförtner T-K, Moor I, De Clercq B, Stevens GWJM, Currie C. Socioeconomic inequalities in adolescent health: a time-series analysis of 34 countries participating in the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children study. The Lancet. 2015;385(9982):2088–95. - PubMed
    1. Singh G, Gopal K, et al. Increasing area deprivation and socioeconomic inequalities in heart disease, stroke, and cardiovascular disease mortality among working Age populations, United States, 1969–2011. Int J MCH AIDS. 2015;3(2):119–13. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback