Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar;21(2):e12552.
doi: 10.1111/desc.12552. Epub 2017 Mar 2.

The procedural learning deficit hypothesis of language learning disorders: we see some problems

Affiliations

The procedural learning deficit hypothesis of language learning disorders: we see some problems

Gillian West et al. Dev Sci. 2018 Mar.

Abstract

Impaired procedural learning has been suggested as a possible cause of developmental dyslexia (DD) and specific language impairment (SLI). This study examined the relationship between measures of verbal and non-verbal implicit and explicit learning and measures of language, literacy and arithmetic attainment in a large sample of 7 to 8-year-old children. Measures of verbal explicit learning were correlated with measures of attainment. In contrast, no relationships between measures of implicit learning and attainment were found. Critically, the reliability of the implicit learning tasks was poor. Our results show that measures of procedural learning, as currently used, are typically unreliable and insensitive to individual differences. A video abstract of this article can be viewed at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnvV-BvNWSo.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Immediate serial recall and Hebb task verbal and non‐verbal stimuli
Figure 2
Figure 2
Non‐verbal serial reaction time task. Children pressed the button on the controller that matched the location of the stimulus
Figure 3
Figure 3
Example matrices for the non‐verbal and verbal conditions of the contextual cueing task
Figure 4
Figure 4
Response times for the SRT and contextual cueing implicit learning tasks, and recall scores for the Hebb tasks. Error bars are 95% confidence intervals
Figure 5
Figure 5
Confirmatory factor analysis showing relationship of memory and attainment tasks to latent variables of verbal and non‐verbal memory. WL‐L = Word Lists learning score; WL‐D = Word Lists delay score; WL‐C = Word Lists consolidation score; DL‐L = Dot Locations learning score; DL‐D = Dot Locations delay score; DL‐C = Dot Locations consolidation score: ISR(V) = verbal immediate serial recall; ISR(NV) = non‐verbal immediate serial recall; Language = TROG‐2 total score; Literacy = Literacy composite of WRAT spelling, TOWRE word and non‐word reading and Picture Word Matching; Arithmetic = composite of TOBANS addition, subtraction and multiplication subtests

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Acheson, D.J. , Hamidi, M. , Binder, J.R. , & Postle, B.R. (2011). A common neural substrate for language production and verbal working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 1358–1367. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allen, R. , & Hulme, C. (2006). Speech and language processing mechanisms in verbal serial recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 64–88.
    1. Archibald, L.M. , & Joanisse, M.F. (2013). Domain‐specific and domain‐general constraints on word and sequence learning. Memory and Cognition, 41, 268–280. - PubMed
    1. Baird, G. , Dworzynski, K. , Slonims, V. , & Simonoff, E. (2010). Memory impairment in children with language impairment. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 52, 535–540. - PubMed
    1. Bennett, I.J. , Romano, J.C. , Howard, Jr, J.H. , & Howard, D.V. (2008). Two forms of implicit learning in young adults with dyslexia. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1145, 184–198. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources