Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec;14(6):937-944.
doi: 10.1111/iwj.12734. Epub 2017 Mar 7.

Effectiveness of a polyhexanide irrigation solution on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in a porcine wound model

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Effectiveness of a polyhexanide irrigation solution on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in a porcine wound model

Stephen C Davis et al. Int Wound J. 2017 Dec.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Irrigation and removal of necrotic debris can be beneficial for proper healing. It is becoming increasingly evident that wounds colonized with biofilm forming bacteria, such as Staphylococcus aureus (SA), can be more difficult to eradicate. Here we report our findings of the effects of an irrigation solution containing propyl-betaine and polyhexanide (PHMB) on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) biofilms in a porcine wound model. Thirty-nine deep partial thickness wounds were created with six wounds assigned to one of six treatment groups: (i) PHMB, (ii) Ringer's solution, (iii) hypochlorous acid/sodium hypochlorite, (iv) sterile water, (v) octenidine dihydrochloride, and (vi) octenilin. Wounds were inoculated with MRSA and covered with a polyurethane dressing for 24 hours to allow biofilm formation. The dressings were then removed and the wounds were irrigated twice daily for 3 days with the appropriate solution. MRSA from four wounds were recovered from each treatment group at 3 days and 6 days hours after initial treatment. Irrigation of wounds with the PHMB solution resulted in 97·85% and 99·64% reductions of MRSA at the respective 3 days and 6 days assessment times when compared to the untreated group. Both of these reductions were statistically significant compared to all other treatment groups (P values <0·05).

Keywords: MRSA; PHMB; Porcine model; Wound irrigation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Experimental Design
Figure 2
Figure 2
Combined bacterial counts of methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA300 after treatment application.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. U.S. markets for wound management products. Irvine, CA: Medical Data International, August 1997.
    1. Services UDoHaH . Guidance to surveyors for long term care facilities, 2004. Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities on World Wide Web URL: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/
    1. Armstrong DG, Wrobel J, Robbins JM. Guest editorial: are diabetes‐related wounds and amputations worse than cancer? Int Wound J 2007;4:286–7. - PubMed
    1. Escandon J, Vivas AC, Tang J, Rowland KJ, Kirsner RS. High mortality in patients with chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen 2011;19:526–8. - PubMed
    1. Brook I, Frazier EH. Aerobic and anaerobic microbiology of infection after trauma. Am J Emerg Med 1998;16:585–591. - PubMed

MeSH terms