Background: Low health literacy increases the risk for hospital readmissions. Despite this, the measurement and use of health literacy to guide discharge counseling and planning in heart failure patients is not commonly performed. A short 3-Question Brief Health Literacy Screen (BHLS) is available and takes less than three minutes to complete, but has never been evaluated to help determine whether health literacy affects healthcare use after discharge in patients with heart failure.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess 30-day readmissions and emergency department visits based on health literacy evaluated by the BHLS in an acute care heart failure population.
Methods: This was a prospective observational cohort study conducted at a large quaternary health system. Hospitalized patients with a diagnosis of heart failure were assessed for health literacy using the BHLS. Unplanned healthcare use after discharge including 30-day, all-cause ED visits and hospital readmissions was assessed using univariate and logistic regression models.
Results: Two hundred and sixty four patients aged 66.6 ± 14.3 (mean ± SD) years met inclusion/exclusion criteria of whom 175 (66.3%) had a BHLS score >9 (adequate health literacy) and 89 (33.7%) had a BHLS score ≤9 (low health literacy). Predictors of low health literacy included older age (p = 0.019), lower education level (p < 0.001) and unemployed (p = 0.048). After controlling for potential confounders, low health literacy was independently associated with 30-day healthcare use after hospital discharge (OR:1.80; 95% CI: 1.04-3.11; p = 0.035).
Conclusion: Using a short, 3-question validated survey instrument, it was demonstrated that low health literacy was associated with increased 30-day unplanned healthcare use after discharge in this heart failure population. These results provide a clinically useful, easily incorporated tool that could identify high-risk patients at need for clinical interventions.
Keywords: Cohort study; Health literacy; Hospital re-admissions; Medication safety; Prospective evaluation.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.