Impact of a multivariate serum-based proteomic test on physician treatment recommendations for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
- PMID: 28277859
- DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1301903
Impact of a multivariate serum-based proteomic test on physician treatment recommendations for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
Abstract
Objective: The VeriStrat 1 (VS) test is intended to help guide treatment decisions for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without an EGFR-sensitizing mutation, classifying patients into two categories. Patients classified as VSGood have a favorable prognosis and significant clinical response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Patients classified as VSPoor have a less favorable prognosis and exhibit no significant response to EGFR-TKIs. The objective of this paper is to assess the real-world impact of VS test results on physicians' treatment recommendations including referrals for best supportive care (BSC).
Methods: Between 1 January 2012 and 1 November 2016, physician respondents were asked to complete standardized questionnaires before and after receiving VS results in patients meeting criteria for the intended use of the VS test. This study evaluated three endpoints: whether physicians followed VS test results in making treatment recommendations, the extent to which tests results changed these treatment recommendations, and the patterns of care subsequent to VS testing.
Results: Of the tests ordered by 989 physicians, 2494 VS tests had completed treatment recommendation questionnaires both prior to and after testing. Prior to VS testing, physicians were considering treatment with EGFR-TKIs for 2250 patients (90%). The VS test classified 1950 patients as VSGood and 544 patients as VSPoor. For patients classified as VSPoor, physicians recommended BSC for 25% of patients and standard systemic treatments such as chemotherapies for 65% of patients. Consistent with previous publications, physicians recommended EGFR-TKI therapy for only 10% of VSPoor patients but for 89% of VSGood patients. Overall, physician's treatment recommendations were consistent with test results in 98% of cases. Availability of test results decreased ineffective treatment recommendations by 89% for VSPoor patients.
Conclusions: Among physicians ordering VS, the test significantly influenced treatment recommendations for patients with NSCLC, reducing ineffective and expensive treatment at the end of life.
Keywords: Blood proteins; Hospice; Non-small-cell lung cancer; Prognosis; best supportive care.
Similar articles
-
Prognostic performance of proteomic testing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 Sep;36(9):1497-1505. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1790346. Epub 2020 Jul 23. Curr Med Res Opin. 2020. PMID: 32615813
-
Impact of clinical parameters and systemic inflammatory status on epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients readministration with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors.BMC Cancer. 2016 Nov 8;16(1):868. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2917-6. BMC Cancer. 2016. PMID: 27821111 Free PMC article.
-
The association between clinical prognostic factors and epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) efficacy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients: a retrospective assessment of 94 cases with EGFR mutations.Oncotarget. 2017 Jan 10;8(2):3412-3421. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13787. Oncotarget. 2017. PMID: 27926500 Free PMC article.
-
Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors as initial therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: focus on epidermal growth factor receptor mutation testing and mutation-positive patients.Cancer Treat Rev. 2013 Dec;39(8):839-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2013.05.001. Epub 2013 Jun 12. Cancer Treat Rev. 2013. PMID: 23768755 Review.
-
Next-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in epidermal growth factor receptor -mutant non-small cell lung cancer.Lung Cancer. 2016 Mar;93:59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.01.003. Epub 2016 Jan 8. Lung Cancer. 2016. PMID: 26898616 Review.
Cited by
-
Prospective on Imaging Mass Spectrometry in Clinical Diagnostics.Mol Cell Proteomics. 2023 Sep;22(9):100576. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100576. Epub 2023 May 19. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2023. PMID: 37209813 Free PMC article. Review.
-
TissueCypher Barrett's esophagus assay impacts clinical decisions in the management of patients with Barrett's esophagus.Endosc Int Open. 2021 Mar;9(3):E348-E355. doi: 10.1055/a-1326-1533. Epub 2021 Feb 18. Endosc Int Open. 2021. PMID: 33655033 Free PMC article.
-
Mass spectrometry-based serum proteomic signature as a potential biomarker for survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving immunotherapy.Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2020 Aug;9(4):1015-1028. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-148. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2020. PMID: 32953481 Free PMC article.
-
Next-Generation Novel Noninvasive Cancer Molecular Diagnostics Platforms Beyond Tissues.Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018 May 23;38(38):964-977. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_199767. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018. PMID: 30231325 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Heuristic value-based framework for lung cancer decision-making.Oncotarget. 2018 Jul 6;9(52):29877-29891. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.25643. eCollection 2018 Jul 6. Oncotarget. 2018. PMID: 30042820 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous