Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar 16;12(3):e0173590.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173590. eCollection 2017.

Temperature-dependent phenology of Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae): Simulation and visualization of current and future distributions along the Eastern Afromontane

Affiliations

Temperature-dependent phenology of Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae): Simulation and visualization of current and future distributions along the Eastern Afromontane

Benignus V Ngowi et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

There is a scarcity of laboratory and field-based results showing the movement of the diamondback moth (DBM) Plutella xylostella (L.) across a spatial scale. We studied the population growth of the diamondback moth (DBM) Plutella xylostella (L.) under six constant temperatures, to understand and predict population changes along altitudinal gradients and under climate change scenarios. Non-linear functions were fitted to continuously model DBM development, mortality, longevity and oviposition. We compiled the best-fitted functions for each life stage to yield a phenology model, which we stochastically simulated to estimate the life table parameters. Three temperature-dependent indices (establishment, generation and activity) were derived from a logistic population growth model and then coupled to collected current (2013) and downscaled temperature data from AFRICLIM (2055) for geospatial mapping. To measure and predict the impacts of temperature change on the pest's biology, we mapped the indices along the altitudinal gradients of Mt. Kilimanjaro (Tanzania) and Taita Hills (Kenya) and assessed the differences between 2013 and 2055 climate scenarios. The optimal temperatures for development of DBM were 32.5, 33.5 and 33°C for eggs, larvae and pupae, respectively. Mortality rates increased due to extreme temperatures to 53.3, 70.0 and 52.4% for egg, larvae and pupae, respectively. The net reproduction rate reached a peak of 87.4 female offspring/female/generation at 20°C. Spatial simulations indicated that survival and establishment of DBM increased with a decrease in temperature, from low to high altitude. However, we observed a higher number of DBM generations at low altitude. The model predicted DBM population growth reduction in the low and medium altitudes by 2055. At higher altitude, it predicted an increase in the level of suitability for establishment with a decrease in the number of generations per year. If climate change occurs as per the selected scenario, DBM infestation may reduce in the selected region. The study highlights the need to validate these predictions with other interacting factors such as cropping practices, host plants and natural enemies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Development rates of immature stages of DBM: Egg (a), larva (b) and pupa (c).
Blue dots are the observed means ± SE, the solid red line represents the selected model output, while the dotted blue lines represent the upper and lower 95% confidence limits. Bars represent standard deviations.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Temperature-dependent mortalities of immature life stages of DBM: Egg (a), larva (b) and pupa (c).
Blue dots are the observed means, the solid red line represents the selected model output, while dotted blue lines represent the upper and lower 95% confidence intervals of selected models.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Temperature-dependent total egg production (a) and age-related cumulative proportion of egg production (b).
Age of the females at 50% oviposition is indicated. Dots represent data points. The upper and lower 95% confidence intervals of the model are indicated.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Population growth parameters of DBM estimated over a range of five constant temperatures.
rm, intrinsic rate of natural increase; Ro, net reproduction rate; GRR, gross reproduction rate; GT, mean generation time; λ, finite rate of increase; and DT, doubling time.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Changes in the establishment, abundance and population growth rates of DBM along altitudinal gradients of Mt. Kilimanjaro and Taita hills.
Establishment risk indices (ERI) of Mt. Kilimanjaro (a) and Taita hills (d); Generation indices (GI) of Mt. Kilimanjaro (b) and Taita hills (e); and Activity indices (AI) of Mt. Kilimanjaro (c) and Taita hills (f) *KisangeB = Kisangesangeni B, KisaMadukani = Kisangesangeni Madukani.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Changed establishment, abundance and population growth rates across climate change scenarios of Mt. Kilimanjaro.
Current 2013 distribution and abundance of DBM: (a) ERI, (b) GI and (c) AI; future 2055 distribution and abundance of DBM: (d) ERI, (e) GI and (f) AI. Absolute change in distribution and abundance between current and future scenarios: (g) ERI, (h) GI and (i) AI. ERI = Establishment Risk Index, GI = Generation Index and AI = Activity Index. *KisangeB = Kisangesangeni B, KisaMadukani = Kisangesangeni Madukani.
Fig 7
Fig 7. Altered establishment, abundance and population growth rates across climate change scenarios of Taita hills.
Current 2013 distribution and abundance of DBM: (a) ERI, (b) GI and (c) AI; future 2055 distribution and abundance of DBM: (d) ERI, (e) GI and (f) AI. Absolute change in distribution and abundance between current and future scenarios: (g) ERI, (h) GI and (i) AI. ERI = Establishment Risk Index, GI = Generation Index and AI = Activity Index.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Furlong MJ, Wright DJ, Dosdall LM (2013) Diamondback moth ecology and management: problems, progress, and prospects. Annu Rev Entomol 58: 517–541. 10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153605 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Verkerk RH, Wright DJ (1996) Multitrophic interactions and management of the diamondback moth: a review. Bull Entomol Res 86: 205–216.
    1. Macharia I, Löhr B, De Groote H (2005) Assessing the potential impact of biological control of Plutella xylostella (diamondback moth) in cabbage production in Kenya. Crop Prot 24: 981–989.
    1. Vickers RA, Furlong MJ, White A, Pell JK (2004) Initiation of fungal epizootics in diamondback moth populations within a large field cage: proof of concept of auto-dissemination. Entomol Exp Appl 111: 7–17.
    1. Shelton AM (2004) Management of the diamondback moth: déjà vu all over again?, pp. 3–8. In The Management of Diamondback Moth and Other Crucifer Pests. Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Management of the Diamondback Moth and Other Crucifer Pests. Department of Natural Resources and Environment. Melbourne, Australia.

Grants and funding

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support for this research from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Finland through the Climate Change Impacts on Ecosystem Services and Food Security in the Eastern Africa (CHIESA) Project and icipe core funding provided by UK Aid from the UK Government, Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida), the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), Germany, and the Kenyan Government.

LinkOut - more resources