Outcomes in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis
- PMID: 28330793
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.017
Outcomes in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis
Abstract
Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is being increasingly performed in patients with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis (AS).
Objectives: This study sought to compare the procedural and clinical outcomes in patients with bicuspid versus tricuspid AS from the Bicuspid AS TAVR multicenter registry.
Methods: Outcomes of 561 patients with bicuspid AS and 4,546 patients with tricuspid AS were compared after propensity score matching, assembling 546 pairs of patients with similar baseline characteristics. Procedural and clinical outcomes were recorded according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria.
Results: Compared with patients with tricuspid AS, patients with bicuspid AS had more frequent conversion to surgery (2.0% vs. 0.2%; p = 0.006) and a significantly lower device success rate (85.3% vs. 91.4%; p = 0.002). Early-generation devices were implanted in 320 patients with bicuspid and 321 patients with tricuspid AS, whereas new-generation devices were implanted in 226 and 225 patients with bicuspid and tricuspid AS, respectively. Within the group receiving early-generation devices, bicuspid AS had more frequent aortic root injury (4.5% vs. 0.0%; p = 0.015) when receiving the balloon-expanding device, and moderate-to-severe paravalvular leak (19.4% vs. 10.5%; p = 0.02) when receiving the self-expanding device. Among patients with new-generation devices, however, procedural results were comparable across different prostheses. The cumulative all-cause mortality rates at 2 years were comparable between bicuspid and tricuspid AS (17.2% vs. 19.4%; p = 0.28).
Conclusions: Compared with tricuspid AS, TAVR in bicuspid AS was associated with a similar prognosis, but lower device success rate. Procedural differences were observed in patients treated with the early-generation devices, whereas no differences were observed with the new-generation devices.
Keywords: aortic stenosis; bicuspid aortic valve; transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
A Cautionary Tale of 2 Leaflets: TAVR in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 May 30;69(21):2590-2591. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.573. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28545632 No abstract available.
-
Outcomes of TAVR in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Sep 26;70(13):1684-1685. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.071. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28935046 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Early- and New-Generation Devices in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Sep 13;68(11):1195-1205. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.06.041. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 27609682
-
Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease: A Report From the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry.Circulation. 2020 Mar 31;141(13):1071-1079. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.040333. Epub 2020 Feb 26. Circulation. 2020. PMID: 32098500
-
Association Between Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid vs Tricuspid Aortic Stenosis and Mortality or Stroke.JAMA. 2019 Jun 11;321(22):2193-2202. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.7108. JAMA. 2019. PMID: 31184741 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with stenotic bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Cardiol. 2018 Jul;41(7):896-902. doi: 10.1002/clc.22992. Epub 2018 Jul 18. Clin Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 29896777 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement for bicuspid aortic stenosis - a systematic review of existing literature.Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Dec;17(6):579-585. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2017.1391692. Epub 2017 Oct 16. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017. PMID: 29017405 Review.
Cited by
-
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis-We Need a Well-Designed Randomized Control Trial.J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 31;13(21):6565. doi: 10.3390/jcm13216565. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39518704 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Four-dimensional computed tomography analysis of bicuspid aortic valves.JTCVS Tech. 2024 Jul 1;27:60-67. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2024.06.012. eCollection 2024 Oct. JTCVS Tech. 2024. PMID: 39478902 Free PMC article.
-
Incidence and predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a balloon-expandable biosprosthesis in patients with bicuspid aortic valves.Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2024 Sep;20(3):311-318. doi: 10.5114/aic.2024.142240. Epub 2024 Aug 13. Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2024. PMID: 39464586 Free PMC article.
-
Costs Associated with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Korea.J Chest Surg. 2024 Nov 5;57(6):536-546. doi: 10.5090/jcs.24.048. Epub 2024 Oct 22. J Chest Surg. 2024. PMID: 39434612 Free PMC article.
-
Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease: From Pathophysiology to Treatment.J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 23;13(17):4970. doi: 10.3390/jcm13174970. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39274183 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
