Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar 10;8:338.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00338. eCollection 2017.

From Attire to Assault: Clothing, Objectification, and De-humanization - A Possible Prelude to Sexual Violence?

Affiliations
Free PMC article

From Attire to Assault: Clothing, Objectification, and De-humanization - A Possible Prelude to Sexual Violence?

Bhuvanesh Awasthi. Front Psychol. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

In the context of objectification and violence, little attention has been paid to the perception neuroscience of how the human brain perceives bodies and objectifies them. Various studies point to how external cues such as appearance and attire could play a key role in encouraging objectification, dehumanization and the denial of agency. Reviewing new experimental findings across several areas of research, it seems that common threads run through issues of clothing, sexual objectification, body perception, dehumanization, and assault. Collating findings from several different lines of research, this article reviews additional evidence from cognitive and neural dynamics of person perception (body and face perception processes) that predict downstream social behavior. Specifically, new findings demonstrate cognitive processing of sexualized female bodies as object-like, a crucial aspect of dehumanized percept devoid of agency and personhood. Sexual violence is a consequence of a dehumanized perception of female bodies that aggressors acquire through their exposure and interpretation of objectified body images. Integrating these findings and identifying triggers for sexual violence may help develop remedial measures and inform law enforcement processes and policy makers alike.

Keywords: clothing; dehumanization; object perception; objectification; sexual violence.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Adams C. J. (1990). The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory. New York, NY: Continuum.
    1. Anderson M. L. (2010). Neural reuse: a fundamental organizational principle of the brain. Behav. Brain Sci. 33 245–313. 10.1017/S0140525X10000853 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Archer D., Iritani B., Kimes D., Barrios M. (1983). Face-ism: five studies of sex differences in facial prominence. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 45 725–735. 10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.725 - DOI
    1. Baker C. N. (2005). Images of women’s sexuality in advertisements: a content analysis of Black- and White-oriented women’s and men’s magazines. Sex Roles 52 13–27. 10.1007/s11199-005-1190-y - DOI
    1. Bargh J. A., Raymond P., Pryor J. B., Strack F. (1995). Attractiveness of the underling: an automatic power – > sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 68 768–781.10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.768 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback