Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 52 (5), 595-604

The Concomitants of Conspiracy Concerns

Affiliations

The Concomitants of Conspiracy Concerns

Daniel Freeman et al. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol.

Abstract

Purpose: A conspiracy world view may be a form of mistrust that is typically corrosive to individual and societal well-being. Our aim was to establish the correlates of conspiracy thinking in an epidemiologically representative sample.

Methods: US National Comorbidity Survey-Replication (NCS-R) data were analysed from 5645 people who had completed the item "I am convinced there is a conspiracy behind many things in the world." Results were weighted to be representative of the US adult English speaking household population.

Results: 1618 people (weighted 26.7%) endorsed the conspiracy belief item. These individuals were more likely to be: male; currently unmarried; less educated; in a lower income household; outside the labour force; from an ethnic minority group; not attending religious services; taking a weapon outside; and perceiving themselves as of lower social standing compared to others. Individuals endorsing the conspiracy belief item had lower levels of physical and psychological well-being, higher levels of suicidal ideation, weaker social networks, less secure attachment style, difficult childhood family experiences, and were more likely to meet criteria for a psychiatric disorder. There were no differences between those who endorsed conspiracy beliefs and those who did not in age, importance of religious beliefs in daily life, body mass index, or in having a gun at home.

Conclusions: Viewing conspiracies in the world is associated with a raised risk of a wide range of adverse circumstances. It is a type of cognitive style that requires systematic empirical study, including monitoring of prevalence, tests of causation, and modelling of propagation.

Keywords: Conspiracy; Epidemiology; Mistrust; Paranoia.

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A psychological conceptualisation of conspiracy beliefs

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 2 PubMed Central articles

References

    1. Jost J. “Elective affinities”: on the psychological bases of left-right differences. Psychol Inq. 2009;20:129–141. doi: 10.1080/10478400903028599. - DOI
    1. Micklethwait J, Wooldridge A. God is back: how the global rise in faith is changing the world. London: Penguin; 2009.
    1. Sunstein C, Vermeule A. Conspiracy theories. J Polit Philos. 2009;17:202–227. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00325.x. - DOI
    1. Bentall RP, Corcoran R, Howard R, Blackwood N, Kinderman P. Persecutory delusions: a review and theoretical integration. Clin Psychol Rev. 2001;21:1143–1192. doi: 10.1016/S0272-7358(01)00106-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Freeman D. Persecutory delusions: a cognitive perspective on understanding and treatment. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3:685–692. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)00066-3. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback