Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
, 32 (8), 1137-1145

Robot-assisted Intersphincteric Resection Facilitates an Efficient Sphincter-Saving in Patients With Low Rectal Cancer

Affiliations
Observational Study

Robot-assisted Intersphincteric Resection Facilitates an Efficient Sphincter-Saving in Patients With Low Rectal Cancer

Jin Cheon Kim et al. Int J Colorectal Dis.

Abstract

Purpose: Few investigations of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection (ISR) are presently available to support this procedure as a safe and efficient procedure. We aimed to evaluate the utility of robot-assisted ISR by comparison between ISR and abdominoperineal resection (APR) using both robot-assisted and open approaches.

Methods: The 558 patients with lower rectal cancer (LRC) who underwent curative operation was enrolled between July 2010 and June 2015 to perform either by robot-assisted (ISR vs. APR = 310 vs. 34) or open approaches (144 vs. 70). Perioperative and functional outcomes including urogenital and anorectal dysfunctions were measured. Recurrence and survival were examined in 216 patients in which >3 years had elapsed after the operation.

Results: The robot-assisted approach was the most significant parameter to determine ISR achievement among potent parameters (OR = 3.467, 95% CI = 2.095-5.738, p < 0.001). Early surgical complications occurred more frequently in the open ISR group (16 vs. 7.7%, p = 0.01). The voiding and male sexual dysfunctions were significantly more frequent in the open ISR (p < 0.05). The fecal incontinence and lifestyle alteration score was greater in the open ISR than in the robot-assisted ISR at 12 and 24 months, respectively (p < 0.05). However, the 3-year cumulative rates of local recurrence and survival did not differ between the two groups.

Conclusions: The current procedure of robot-assisted ISR replaced a significant portion of APR to achieve successful SSO via mostly transabdominal approach and double-stapled anastomosis. The robot-assisted ISR with minimal invasiveness might be a help to reduce anorectal and urogenital dysfunctions.

Keywords: Abdominoperineal resection; Intersphincteric resection; Open; Rectal cancer; Robot.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 2 PubMed Central articles

References

    1. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Oct;21(11):3608-15 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2013 Jan;27(1):48-55 - PubMed
    1. Acta Oncol. 2007;46(4):504-16 - PubMed
    1. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014 May;29(5):555-62 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 1994 Sep;81(9):1376-8 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback