Psychologically Informed Implementations of Sugary-Drink Portion Limits

Psychol Sci. 2017 May;28(5):620-629. doi: 10.1177/0956797617692041. Epub 2017 Mar 31.

Abstract

In 2012, the New York City Board of Health prohibited restaurants from selling sugary drinks in containers that would hold more than 16 oz. Although a state court ruled that the Board of Health did not have the authority to implement such a policy, it remains a legally viable option for governments and a voluntary option for restaurants. However, there is very limited empirical data on how such a policy might affect the purchasing and consumption of sugary drinks. We report four well-powered, incentive-compatible experiments in which we evaluated two possible ways that restaurants might comply with such a policy: bundling (i.e., dividing the contents of oversized cups into two regulation-size cups) and providing free refills (i.e., offering a regulation-size cup with unlimited refills). Bundling caused people to buy less soda. Free refills increased consumption, especially when a waiter served the refills. This perverse effect was reduced in self-service contexts that required walking just a few steps to get a refill.

Keywords: consumption; health; open data; open materials; purchasing; sugar-sweetened beverage.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Beverages / statistics & numerical data
  • Beverages / supply & distribution*
  • Carbohydrates / adverse effects*
  • Dietary Sucrose / adverse effects*
  • Economics / statistics & numerical data*
  • Female
  • Health Education
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • New York City / ethnology
  • Nutrition Policy / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Carbohydrates
  • Dietary Sucrose