Violence risk assessment tools are increasingly used within criminal justice and forensic psychiatry, however there is little relevant, reliable and unbiased data regarding their predictive accuracy. We argue that such data are needed to (i) prevent excessive reliance on risk assessment scores, (ii) allow matching of different risk assessment tools to different contexts of application, (iii) protect against problematic forms of discrimination and stigmatisation, and (iv) ensure that contentious demographic variables are not prematurely removed from risk assessment tools.
Keywords: Crime prediction; Ethics and human rights; Forensic psychiatry; Racial profiling; Risk assessment; Violence.
Copyright © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.