Improving medical record retrieval for validation studies in Medicare data
- PMID: 28374489
- DOI: 10.1002/pds.4131
Improving medical record retrieval for validation studies in Medicare data
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of the study is to describe medical record retrieval for a study validating claims-based algorithms used to identify seven adverse events of special interest (AESI) in a Medicare population.
Methods: We analyzed 2010-2011 Medicare claims of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis and men ≥65 years of age in the Medicare 5% national sample. The final cohorts included beneficiaries covered continuously for 12+ months by Medicare parts A, B, and D and not enrolled in Medicare Advantage before starting follow-up. We identified beneficiaries using each AESI algorithm and randomly selected 400 women and 100 men with each AESI for medical record retrieval. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services provided beneficiary contact information, and we requested medical records directly from providers, without patient contact.
Results: We selected 3331 beneficiaries (women: 2272; men: 559) for whom we requested 3625 medical records. Overall, we received 1738 [47.9% (95%CI 46.3%, 49.6%)] of the requested medical records. We observed small differences in the characteristics of the total population with AESIs compared with those randomly selected for retrieval; however, no differences were seen between those selected and those retrieved. We retrieved 54.7% of records requested from hospitals compared with 26.3% of records requested from physician offices (p < 0.001). Retrieval did not differ by sex or vital status of the beneficiaries.
Conclusions: Our national medical record validation study of claims-based algorithms produced a modest retrieval rate. The medical record procedures outlined in this paper could have led to the improved retrieval from our previous medical record retrieval study. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keywords: Medicare; claims-based algorithms; medical record retrieval; pharmacoepidemiology.
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Similar articles
-
The Validity of Claims-Based Algorithms to Identify Serious Hypersensitivity Reactions and Osteonecrosis of the Jaw.PLoS One. 2015 Jul 10;10(7):e0131601. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131601. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26161858 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of claims-based algorithms for gout flares.Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016 Jul;25(7):820-6. doi: 10.1002/pds.4044. Epub 2016 May 27. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016. PMID: 27230083 Free PMC article.
-
The Design and Validation of a New Algorithm to Identify Incident Fractures in Administrative Claims Data.J Bone Miner Res. 2019 Oct;34(10):1798-1807. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3807. Epub 2019 Aug 5. J Bone Miner Res. 2019. PMID: 31170317 Clinical Trial.
-
Defining care provided for breast cancer based on medical record review or Medicare claims: information from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Patterns of Care Study.Ann Epidemiol. 2012 Nov;22(11):807-13. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Sep 1. Ann Epidemiol. 2012. PMID: 22948184
-
Evidence generation from healthcare databases: recommendations for managing change.Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016 Jul;25(7):749-54. doi: 10.1002/pds.4004. Epub 2016 May 17. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016. PMID: 27183900 Review.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
