Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Sep;71(9):1129-1132.
doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2017.37. Epub 2017 Apr 5.

Effects of Non-Nutritive (Artificial vs Natural) Sweeteners on 24-h Glucose Profiles

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of Non-Nutritive (Artificial vs Natural) Sweeteners on 24-h Glucose Profiles

S L Tey et al. Eur J Clin Nutr. .

Abstract

Replacing nutritive sweetener with non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) has the potential to improve glycaemic control. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of consuming artificial NNS (that is, aspartame), natural NNS (that is, monk fruit and stevia), and sucrose-sweetened beverages on 24-h glucose profiles. Ten healthy males took part in this randomised, crossover study with the following four treatments: aspartame-, monk fruit-, stevia-, and sucrose- (65 g) sweetened beverages. Participants were asked to consume the test beverage as a preload mid-morning. Medtronic iPro2 continuous glucose monitoring system was used to measure mean 24-h glucose, incremental area under the curve (iAUC) and total area under the curve (AUC) for glucose, and 24-h glycaemic variability. Overall no significant differences were found in mean 24-h glucose, iAUC and total AUC for glucose, and 24-h glycaemic variability between the four test beverages. Twenty-four-hour glucose profiles did not differ between beverages sweetened with non-nutritive (artificial vs natural) and nutritive sweeteners. The simple exchange of a single serving of sucrose-sweetened beverage with NNS over a day appears to have minimal effect on 24-h glucose profiles in healthy males.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 3 articles

References

    1. Circulation. 2012 Jul 24;126(4):509-19 - PubMed
    1. Int J Obes (Lond). 2016 Jun;40(6):990-7 - PubMed
    1. Int J Obes (Lond). 2017 Mar;41(3):450-457 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 2016 Apr 9;387(10027):1513-30 - PubMed
    1. Br J Nutr. 2005 Feb;93(2):179-82 - PubMed

Publication types

Feedback