Mating Changes Sexually Dimorphic Gene Expression in the Seed Beetle Callosobruchus maculatus
- PMID: 28391318
- PMCID: PMC5381559
- DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evx029
Mating Changes Sexually Dimorphic Gene Expression in the Seed Beetle Callosobruchus maculatus
Abstract
Sexually dimorphic phenotypes arise largely from sex-specific gene expression, which has mainly been characterized in sexually naïve adults. However, we expect sexual dimorphism in transcription to be dynamic and dependent on factors such as reproductive status. Mating induces many behavioral and physiological changes distinct to each sex and is therefore expected to activate regulatory changes in many sex-biased genes. Here, we first characterized sexual dimorphism in gene expression in Callosobruchus maculatus seed beetles. We then examined how females and males respond to mating and how it affects sex-biased expression, both in sex-limited (abdomen) and sex-shared (head and thorax) tissues. Mating responses were largely sex-specific and, as expected, females showed more genes responding compared with males (∼2,000 vs. ∼300 genes in the abdomen, ∼500 vs. ∼400 in the head and thorax, respectively). Of the sex-biased genes present in virgins, 16% (1,041 genes) in the abdomen and 17% (243 genes) in the head and thorax altered their relative expression between the sexes as a result of mating. Sex-bias status changed in 2% of the genes in the abdomen and 4% in the head and thorax following mating. Mating responses involved de-feminization of females and, to a lesser extent, de-masculinization of males relative to their virgin state: mating decreased rather than increased dimorphic expression of sex-biased genes. The fact that regulatory changes of both types of sex-biased genes occurred in both sexes suggests that male- and female-specific selection is not restricted to male- and female-biased genes, respectively, as is sometimes assumed.
Keywords: RNA-Seq; alternative splicing; sex-biased expression; sex-specific selection; transcriptome.
© The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Fungal Infection Induces Sex-Specific Transcriptional Changes and Alters Sexual Dimorphism in the Dioecious Plant Silene latifolia.PLoS Genet. 2015 Oct 8;11(10):e1005536. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005536. eCollection 2015 Oct. PLoS Genet. 2015. PMID: 26448481 Free PMC article.
-
Identification and functional analyses of sex determination genes in the sexually dimorphic stag beetle Cyclommatus metallifer.BMC Genomics. 2016 Mar 22;17:250. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2522-8. BMC Genomics. 2016. PMID: 27001106 Free PMC article.
-
Sexual conflict drives micro- and macroevolution of sexual dimorphism in immunity.BMC Biol. 2021 Jun 2;19(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12915-021-01049-6. BMC Biol. 2021. PMID: 34078377 Free PMC article.
-
An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2008 May;83(2):151-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00037.x. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2008. PMID: 18429767 Review.
-
Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios.J Evol Biol. 2008 Jul;21(4):919-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01540.x. Epub 2008 May 6. J Evol Biol. 2008. PMID: 18462318 Review.
Cited by
-
Sexually dimorphic gene expression and transcriptome evolution provide mixed evidence for a fast-Z effect in Heliconius.J Evol Biol. 2019 Mar;32(3):194-204. doi: 10.1111/jeb.13410. Epub 2019 Jan 11. J Evol Biol. 2019. PMID: 30523653 Free PMC article.
-
Combined transcriptome and proteome profiling reveals specific molecular brain signatures for sex, maturation and circalunar clock phase.Elife. 2019 Feb 15;8:e41556. doi: 10.7554/eLife.41556. Elife. 2019. PMID: 30767890 Free PMC article.
-
Sex-specific dominance reversal of genetic variation for fitness.PLoS Biol. 2018 Dec 11;16(12):e2006810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006810. eCollection 2018 Dec. PLoS Biol. 2018. PMID: 30533008 Free PMC article.
-
Divergence in Transcriptional and Regulatory Responses to Mating in Male and Female Fruitflies.Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 6;9(1):16100. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51141-9. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 31695054 Free PMC article.
-
The genomic footprint of sexual conflict.Nat Ecol Evol. 2019 Dec;3(12):1725-1730. doi: 10.1038/s41559-019-1041-9. Epub 2019 Nov 18. Nat Ecol Evol. 2019. PMID: 31740847
References
-
- Arbeitman MN, et al. 2002. Gene expression during the life cycle of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 297:2270–2275. - PubMed
-
- Arnqvist G, Rowe L. 2005. Sexual conflict. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
