Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Apr 10;9(4):373.
doi: 10.3390/nu9040373.

The Effects of Pre-Operative Enteral Nutrition from Nasal Feeding Tubes on Gastric Outlet Obstruction

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The Effects of Pre-Operative Enteral Nutrition from Nasal Feeding Tubes on Gastric Outlet Obstruction

Zhi-Hua Chen et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

We examined gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) patients who received two weeks of strengthening pre-operative enteral nutrition therapy (pre-EN) through a nasal-jejenal feeding tube placed under a gastroscope to evaluate the feasibility and potential benefit of pre-EN compared to parenteral nutrition (PN). In this study, 68 patients confirmed to have GOO with upper-gastrointestinal contrast and who accepted the operation were randomized into an EN group and a PN group. The differences in nutritional status, immune function, post-operative complications, weight of patients, first bowel sound and first flatus time, pull tube time, length of hospital stay (LOH), and cost of hospitalization between pre-operation and post-operation were all recorded. Statistical analyses were performed using the chi square test and t-test; statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. The success rate of the placement was 91.18% (three out of 31 cases). After pre-EN, the levels of weight, albumin (ALB), prealbumin (PA), and transferrin (TNF) in the EN group were significantly increased by pre-operation day compared to admission day, but were not significantly increased in the PN group; the weights in the EN group were significantly increased compared to the PN group by pre-operation day and day of discharge; total protein (TP), ALB, PA, and TNF of the EN group were significantly increased compared to the PN group on pre-operation and post-operative days one and three. The levels of CD3+, CD4+/CD8+, IgA, and IgM in the EN group were higher than those of the PN group at pre-operation and post-operation; the EN group had a significantly lower incidence of poor wound healing, peritoneal cavity infection, pneumonia, and a shorter first bowel sound time, first flatus time, and post-operation hospital stay than the PN group. Pre-EN through a nasal-jejunum feeding tube and placed under a gastroscope in GOO patients was safe, feasible, and beneficial to the nutrition status, immune function, and gastrointestinal function, and sped up recovery, while not increasing the cost of hospitalization.

Keywords: enteral nutrition; gastric outlet obstruction; gastroscope; immune function; pre-operative.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fiori E., Lamazza A., Demasi E., Decesare A., Schillaci A., Sterpetti A.V. Endoscopic stenting for gastric outlet obstruction in patients with unresectable antropyloric cancer. Systematic review of the literature and final results of a prospective study. The point of view of a surgical group. Am. J. Surg. 2013;206:210–217. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.08.018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Madjov R., Chervenkov P. Carcinoma of the papilla of Vater. Diagnostic and surgical problems. Hepatogastroenterology. 2003;50:621–624. - PubMed
    1. Hooft J.E., Montfoort M.L., Jeurnink S.M., Bruno M.J., Dijkgraaf M.G., Siersema P.D., Fockens P. Safety and efficacy of a new non-foreshortening nitinol stent in malignant gastric outlet obstruction (DUONITI study): A prospective, multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2011;43:671–675. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256383. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Keranen I., Kylanpaa L., Udd M., Louhimo J., Lepistö A., Halttunen J., Kokkola A. Gastric outlet obstruction in gastric cancer: A comparison of three palliative methods. J. Surg. Oncol. 2013;108:537–541. doi: 10.1002/jso.23442. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Okumura Y., Yamashita H., Aikou S., Yagi K., Yamagata Y., Nishida M., Mori K., Nomura S., Kitayama J., Watanabe T., et al. Palliative distal gastrectomy offers no survival benefit over gastrojejunostomy for gastric cancer with outlet obstruction: Retrospective analysis of an 11-year experience. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2014;12:364. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-364. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms