Coverage of Large-Scale Food Fortification of Edible Oil, Wheat Flour, and Maize Flour Varies Greatly by Vehicle and Country but Is Consistently Lower among the Most Vulnerable: Results from Coverage Surveys in 8 Countries
- PMID: 28404836
- PMCID: PMC5404213
- DOI: 10.3945/jn.116.245753
Coverage of Large-Scale Food Fortification of Edible Oil, Wheat Flour, and Maize Flour Varies Greatly by Vehicle and Country but Is Consistently Lower among the Most Vulnerable: Results from Coverage Surveys in 8 Countries
Abstract
Background: Large-scale food fortification (LSFF) of commonly consumed food vehicles is widely implemented in low- and middle-income countries. Many programs have monitoring information gaps and most countries fail to assess program coverage.Objective: The aim of this work was to present LSFF coverage survey findings (overall and in vulnerable populations) from 18 programs (7 wheat flour, 4 maize flour, and 7 edible oil programs) conducted in 8 countries between 2013 and 2015.Methods: A Fortification Assessment Coverage Toolkit (FACT) was developed to standardize the assessments. Three indicators were used to assess the relations between coverage and vulnerability: 1) poverty, 2) poor dietary diversity, and 3) rural residence. Three measures of coverage were assessed: 1) consumption of the vehicle, 2) consumption of a fortifiable vehicle, and 3) consumption of a fortified vehicle. Individual program performance was assessed based on the following: 1) achieving overall coverage ≥50%, 2) achieving coverage of ≥75% in ≥1 vulnerable group, and 3) achieving equity in coverage for ≥1 vulnerable group.Results: Coverage varied widely by food vehicle and country. Only 2 of the 18 LSFF programs assessed met all 3 program performance criteria. The 2 main program bottlenecks were a poor choice of vehicle and failure to fortify a fortifiable vehicle (i.e., absence of fortification).Conclusions: The results highlight the importance of sound program design and routine monitoring and evaluation. There is strong evidence of the impact and cost-effectiveness of LSFF; however, impact can only be achieved when the necessary activities and processes during program design and implementation are followed. The FACT approach fills an important gap in the availability of standardized tools. The LSFF programs assessed here need to be re-evaluated to determine whether to further invest in the programs, whether other vehicles are appropriate, and whether other approaches are needed.
Keywords: edible oil; large-scale food fortification; maize flour; program coverage; wheat flour.
Conflict of interest statement
3: Author disclosures: GJ Aaron, VM Friesen, S Jungjohann, GS Garrett, LM Neufeld, and M Myatt, no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Identifying zambia's industrial fortification options: toward overcoming the food and nutrition information gap-induced impasse.Food Nutr Bull. 2013 Dec;34(4):480-500. doi: 10.1177/156482651303400412. Food Nutr Bull. 2013. PMID: 24605697
-
Assessing Coverage of Population-Based and Targeted Fortification Programs with the Use of the Fortification Assessment Coverage Toolkit (FACT): Background, Toolkit Development, and Supplement Overview.J Nutr. 2017 May;147(5):981S-983S. doi: 10.3945/jn.116.242842. Epub 2017 Apr 12. J Nutr. 2017. PMID: 28404838 Free PMC article.
-
Coverage of Nutrition Interventions Intended for Infants and Young Children Varies Greatly across Programs: Results from Coverage Surveys in 5 Countries.J Nutr. 2017 May;147(5):995S-1003S. doi: 10.3945/jn.116.245407. Epub 2017 Apr 12. J Nutr. 2017. PMID: 28404839 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Coverage and Utilization in Food Fortification Programs: Critical and Neglected Areas of Evaluation.J Nutr. 2017 May;147(5):1015S-1019S. doi: 10.3945/jn.116.246157. Epub 2017 Apr 12. J Nutr. 2017. PMID: 28404835 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Recommendations for improving Guatemala's food fortification program based on household income and expenditure survey (HIES) data.Food Nutr Bull. 2010 Jun;31(2):251-69. doi: 10.1177/156482651003100208. Food Nutr Bull. 2010. PMID: 20707231
Cited by 27 articles
-
Decisions to Start, Strengthen, and Sustain Food Fortification Programs: An Application of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Evidence to Decision (EtD) Framework in Nigeria.Curr Dev Nutr. 2022 Jan 31;6(3):nzac010. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzac010. eCollection 2022 Mar. Curr Dev Nutr. 2022. PMID: 35261958 Free PMC article.
-
Firm's compliance behaviour towards food fortification regulations: Evidence from oil and salt producers in Bangladesh.Food Policy. 2021 Oct;104:102143. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102143. Food Policy. 2021. PMID: 34720344 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding drivers of private-sector compliance to large-scale food fortification: A case study on edible oil value chains in Bangladesh.Food Policy. 2021 Oct;104:102127. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102127. Food Policy. 2021. PMID: 34720342 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic Process Framework for Conducting Implementation Science Research in Food Fortification Programs.Glob Health Sci Pract. 2021 Jun 30;9(2):412-421. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00707. Print 2021 Jun 30. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2021. PMID: 34038381 Free PMC article.
-
Examining Heterogeneity of Food Fortification and Biofortification Business Models: Emerging Evidence for a Typology.Nutrients. 2021 Apr 8;13(4):1233. doi: 10.3390/nu13041233. Nutrients. 2021. PMID: 33917974 Free PMC article.
References
-
- WHO, FAO. Guidelines on food fortification with micronutrients [Internet]. 2006 [cited 2016 Sep 17]. Available from: http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/guide_food_fortification_micro....
-
- Bishai D, Nalubola R. The history of food fortification in the United States: its relevance for current fortification efforts in developing countries. Econ Devel Cult Change 2002;51:37–53.
-
- De Wals P, Tairou F, Van Allen MI, Uh S-H, Lowry RB, Sibbald B, Evans JA, Van den Hof MC, Zimmer P, Crowley M, et al. . Reduction in neural-tube defects after folic acid fortification in Canada. N Engl J Med 2007;357:135–42. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
