Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban and warfarin in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism: a propensity-matched nationwide cohort study
- PMID: 28411120
- DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30054-6
Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban and warfarin in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism: a propensity-matched nationwide cohort study
Abstract
Background: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism are collectively known as venous thromboembolism (VTE), which is a common vascular disease and a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. We compare effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in a prospective cohort of routine care patients with incident unprovoked VTE.
Methods: In this propensity-matched cohort study, we linked nationwide Danish health registries to identify all patients with a first hospital diagnosis of unprovoked VTE who were new users of rivaroxaban or warfarin. Excluded patients included those who had not been residents in Denmark for at least 1 year before VTE diagnosis, patients with outpatient VTE diagnosis only, patients with other indications for oral anticoagulation treatment, patients with previous experience of oral anticoagulation, patients who did not have a prescription for rivaroxaban or warfarin within 7 days of VTE, and patients who redeemed prescriptions for both rivaroxaban and warfarin, or other oral anticoagulants. Primary effectiveness outcome was recurrent VTE and primary safety outcome was major bleeding. We used propensity matching and Cox regression to compare rates of the outcomes with rivaroxaban versus standard treatment.
Results: From Dec 9, 2011, to Feb 28, 2016, we identified 29 963 patients with incident VTE. After exclusion, we identified 1734 propensity-matched patients given rivaroxaban (1751 before propensity matching) and 2945 propensity-matched patients given warfarin. The rate of recurrent VTE at 6 months' follow-up was 9·9 incidents per 100 person-years with rivaroxaban versus 13·1 incidents per 100 person-years with warfarin, yielding a hazard ratio (HR) of 0·74 (95% CI 0·56-0·96). The rate of major bleeding was 2·4 per 100 person-years at 6 months in rivaroxaban users versus 2·0 in warfarin users (HR 1·19, 95% CI 0·66-2·13).
Interpretation: In this clinical practice setting, rivaroxaban in patients with unprovoked VTE was associated with reduced risk of recurrent VTE compared with standard treatment, without compromising safety.
Funding: Obel Family Foundation.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin for treatment and prevention of recurrence of venous thromboembolism.Thromb Haemost. 2017 Oct 5;117(10):1841-1847. doi: 10.1160/TH17-03-0210. Epub 2017 Jun 22. Thromb Haemost. 2017. PMID: 28640322
-
Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism: A propensity-score weighted administrative claims cohort study.Thromb Res. 2018 Aug;168:31-36. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2018.05.031. Epub 2018 May 30. Thromb Res. 2018. PMID: 29883907
-
Effectiveness and safety of outpatient rivaroxaban versus warfarin for treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with a known primary hypercoagulable state.Thromb Res. 2018 Mar;163:132-137. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2018.01.046. Epub 2018 Jan 31. Thromb Res. 2018. PMID: 29407625
-
Secondary prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism after initial oral anticoagulation therapy in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 15;12(12):CD011088. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011088.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 29244199 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment of venous thromboembolism, with a focus on patients with pulmonary embolism: an evidence-based review.Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2014 Nov 7;10:627-39. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S50543. eCollection 2014. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2014. PMID: 25404858 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism using Real-World Data: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2024 Nov;24(6):823-839. doi: 10.1007/s40256-024-00677-x. Epub 2024 Sep 10. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2024. PMID: 39254826
-
Long-term survival in venous thromboembolic disease: rivaroxaban vs. warfarin - propensity score matching study.BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2023 Dec 13;24(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s40360-023-00712-8. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2023. PMID: 38093310 Free PMC article.
-
Trends in the Use of Oral Anticoagulants for Adults With Venous Thromboembolism in the US, 2010-2020.JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e234059. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.4059. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. PMID: 36947039 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants: a nationwide propensity score-weighted study.Blood Adv. 2023 Jun 13;7(11):2564-2572. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022009099. Blood Adv. 2023. PMID: 36562754 Free PMC article.
-
Sequential Therapy of Nadroparin and Rivaroxaban in the Initial Treatment of Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism.Front Pharmacol. 2022 Mar 24;13:810455. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.810455. eCollection 2022. Front Pharmacol. 2022. PMID: 35401221 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
