Safe and cost-effective cleaning of pressure-monitoring transducers

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1988 Sep;9(9):409-16. doi: 10.1086/645900.

Abstract

The CDC category I recommendation for high-level disinfection of pressure-monitoring transducers between uses imposes substantial costs. This practice has not been shown to be useful when disposable transducer domes are used. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study assessed the consequences of wiping transducers with alcohol between uses rather than sterilizing with ethylene oxide. We studied 5,197 transducer courses with disposable domes involving 2,202 patients in intensive care units during 15 months. There was no significant difference between the two treatment regimens in the risk of positive cultures of fluids from monitored lines, of cultures of cannula tips or of a positive blood culture. We conclude that under normal conditions, ie, in the absence of a cluster of transducer-related bacteremias, wiping transducers with alcohol between uses is sufficient when disposable domes are used.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Catheterization / instrumentation
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Data Collection
  • Disinfection / methods
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Equipment Contamination / prevention & control*
  • Ethanol
  • Ethylene Oxide
  • Humans
  • Random Allocation
  • Sterilization / methods
  • Transducers*
  • Transducers, Pressure*
  • United States

Substances

  • Ethanol
  • Ethylene Oxide