Comparative Effectiveness of Routine Invasive Coronary Angiography for Managing Unstable Angina
- PMID: 28462421
- DOI: 10.7326/M16-2420
Comparative Effectiveness of Routine Invasive Coronary Angiography for Managing Unstable Angina
Abstract
Background: Non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes include unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Most randomized controlled trials of routine versus selective invasive coronary angiography have high rates of crossover from control to intervention groups and do not include subgroup analysis for unstable angina. Consequently, no clear, specific recommendations exist regarding the use of angiography in unstable angina.
Objective: To assess the effect of angiography on mortality in unstable angina, incorporating the results of additional cardiac procedures and events.
Design: Longitudinal study using hospital discharge data, discrete-time survival analysis with propensity score adjustment, and sensitivity analysis.
Setting: Victoria, Australia, 2001 to 2011.
Participants: All residents, all ages.
Intervention: Routine invasive coronary angiography.
Measurements: 12-month all-cause mortality.
Results: Emergently admitted patients with unstable angina (n = 33 901) who did or did not receive angiography during their first hospitalization were balanced on 44 covariates of propensity score. Routine angiography was associated with a 52% decrease in 12-month mortality (hazard ratio, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.38 to 0.61]); revascularization offered no additional statistical mortality benefit compared with diagnostic angiography alone. The predicted cumulative probability of death at 12 months was 0.024 (CI, 0.021 to 0.027) for patients receiving angiography within 2 months of their index unstable angina versus 0.097 (CI, 0.090 to 0.105) for those not receiving it. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that to negate the observed effect size, an unmeasured confounder must independently decrease mortality by 90% and have a prevalence gap of 15% or greater between the angiographic groups.
Limitation: Nonrandom allocation of angiography.
Conclusion: Patients with unstable angina benefit from an invasive management pathway initiated by invasive coronary angiography during their hospitalization and up to 2 months after discharge.
Primary funding sources: National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia and BUPA Health Foundation.
Comment in
-
Does Knowledge of the Coronary Anatomy Save Lives in Patients With Unstable Angina?Ann Intern Med. 2017 Jun 6;166(11):848-849. doi: 10.7326/M17-0947. Epub 2017 May 2. Ann Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28462428 No abstract available.
-
Comparative Effectiveness of Routine Invasive Coronary Angiography for Managing Unstable Angina.Ann Intern Med. 2017 Dec 5;167(11):836. doi: 10.7326/L17-0521. Ann Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 29204617 No abstract available.
-
Comparative Effectiveness of Routine Invasive Coronary Angiography for Managing Unstable Angina.Ann Intern Med. 2017 Dec 5;167(11):836. doi: 10.7326/L17-0522. Ann Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 29204618 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Timing of angiography with a routine invasive strategy and long-term outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: a collaborative analysis of individual patient data from the FRISC II (Fragmin and Fast Revascularization During Instability in Coronary Artery Disease), ICTUS (Invasive Versus Conservative Treatment in Unstable Coronary Syndromes), and RITA-3 (Intervention Versus Conservative Treatment Strategy in Patients With Unstable Angina or Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction) Trials.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Feb;5(2):191-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.10.016. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012. PMID: 22361604
-
Early Invasive Versus Initial Conservative Strategies for Women with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Nationwide Analysis.Am J Med. 2017 Sep;130(9):1059-1067. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.01.049. Epub 2017 Feb 24. Am J Med. 2017. PMID: 28238691
-
Impact of diabetes mellitus on long-term outcome after unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with a very early invasive strategy.Diabetologia. 2004 Jul;47(7):1188-1195. doi: 10.1007/s00125-004-1450-3. Epub 2004 Jul 3. Diabetologia. 2004. PMID: 15235772
-
Contemporary treatment of unstable angina and non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (part 2).Tex Heart Inst J. 2010;37(3):262-75. Tex Heart Inst J. 2010. PMID: 20548800 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Early invasive versus conservative strategies for unstable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in the stent era.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17;(3):CD004815. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004815.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 26;(5):CD004815. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004815.pub4 PMID: 20238333 Updated. Review.
Cited by
-
Outcomes after coronary angiography for unstable angina compared to stable angina, myocardial infarction and an asymptomatic general population.Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2022 Jul 31;42:101099. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101099. eCollection 2022 Oct. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2022. PMID: 35937948 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous