Evidentiary Support in Public Comments to the FDA's Center for Tobacco Products

J Health Polit Policy Law. 2017 Aug;42(4):645-666. doi: 10.1215/03616878-3856121. Epub 2017 May 8.

Abstract

Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) were introduced into the US market in 2007, and until recently these devices were unregulated at the federal level. In 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking asserting its intention to regulate ENDS and requesting public comments on numerous related issues, including potential limits on the sale of flavored ENDS. This article analyzes key comments submitted to the FDA on the issue of flavor regulation in ENDS and examines the weight and credibility of the evidence presented by both supporters and opponents of regulation. It also describes the final deeming rule, published in May 2016, and the FDA's response to the evidence submitted. This is the first study to examine public comments submitted to the FDA's Center for Tobacco Products, and it concludes that opponents of regulation were more likely to rely on sources that were not peer reviewed and that were affected by conflicts of interest. In light of these findings, the FDA and the research community should develop processes to carefully and critically analyze public comments submitted to the FDA on issues of tobacco regulation.

Keywords: Food and Drug Administration; deeming; electronic nicotine delivery systems; flavors; tobacco regulatory science.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Commerce / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Community Participation*
  • Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems*
  • Flavoring Agents
  • Humans
  • Nicotiana*
  • Public Opinion*
  • United States
  • United States Food and Drug Administration*

Substances

  • Flavoring Agents