Early results of a randomized two-by-two factorial phase II trial comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with two and four courses of cisplatin/S-1 and docetaxel/cisplatin/S-1 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer
- PMID: 28486692
- DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx236
Early results of a randomized two-by-two factorial phase II trial comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with two and four courses of cisplatin/S-1 and docetaxel/cisplatin/S-1 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer
Abstract
Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a promising method of improving the survival of resectable gastric cancer. Cisplatin/S-1 (CS) and docetaxel/cisplatin/S-1 (DCS) are both effective against metastatic gastric cancer. This report clarified the impact of these regimens on early endpoints, including the pathological responses, chemotherapy-related toxicities, and surgical results.
Methods: Patients with M0 and either T4 or T3 in case of junctional cancer or scirrhous type received two or four courses of cisplatin (60 mg/m2 at day 8)/S-1 (80 mg/m2 for 21 days with 1 week rest) or docetaxel (40 mg/m2 at day 1)/cisplatin (60 mg/m2 at day 1)/S-1 (80 mg/m2 for 14 days with 2 weeks rest) as NAC. Patients then underwent D2 gastrectomy and adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy for 1 year. The primary endpoint was the 3-year overall survival.
Results: Between October 2011 and September 2014, 132 patients were assigned to receive CS (n = 66; 33 in 2 courses and 33 in 4 courses) or DCS (n = 66; 33 in 2 courses and 33 in 4 courses). The respective major grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicities (CS/DCS) were leukocytopenia (14.1%/26.2%), neutropenia (29.7%/47.7%), anemia (14.1%/12.3%), and platelet reduction (3.1%/1.5%). The rate of pathological response, defined as a complete response or < 10% residual cancer remaining, was 19.4% in the CS group and 15.4% in the DCS group, and 15.6% in the two-course group and 19.0% in the 4-course group. The R0 resection rate was 72.7% in the CS group and 81.8% in the DCS group and 80.3% in the two-course group and the 74.2% in the four-course group. No treatment-related deaths were observed.
Conclusions: Our results do not support three-drug therapy with a taxane over two-drug therapy, or any further treatment beyond two cycles as an attractive candidate for the test arm of NAC.
Keywords: cisplatin/S-1 (CS); docetaxel/cisplatin/S-1 (DCS); gastric cancer; neoadjuvant therapy.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Similar articles
-
A phase II study of neoadjuvant combination chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 for locally advanced resectable gastric cancer: nucleotide excision repair (NER) as potential chemoresistance marker.Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013 Mar;71(3):789-97. doi: 10.1007/s00280-013-2073-5. Epub 2013 Jan 22. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013. PMID: 23338051 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin and S-1 for resectable locally advanced gastric cancer.Int J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb;21(1):102-9. doi: 10.1007/s10147-015-0851-2. Epub 2015 May 28. Int J Clin Oncol. 2016. PMID: 26017926
-
A phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1, followed by gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for high-risk advanced gastric cancer: results of the KDOG1001 trial.Gastric Cancer. 2019 May;22(3):598-606. doi: 10.1007/s10120-018-0884-0. Epub 2018 Oct 3. Gastric Cancer. 2019. PMID: 30284080 Clinical Trial.
-
[A Case of Simultaneous Multiple Gastric Cancers Showing Differences of Response after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Docetaxel, CDDP, and S-1].Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2016 Nov;43(12):2377-2379. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2016. PMID: 28133327 Review. Japanese.
-
[Curative resection of a case of advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination responding well to combination chemotherapy of docetaxel,cisplatin and S-1].Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2013 Sep;40(9):1221-4. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2013. PMID: 24047784 Review. Japanese.
Cited by
-
Computed tomography-based radiomics nomogram for predicting therapeutic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer : A scale for treatment predicting.Clin Transl Oncol. 2024 Mar 11. doi: 10.1007/s12094-024-03417-4. Online ahead of print. Clin Transl Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38467894
-
Clinical Effect of Tumor-Specific Total Nutrients in Patients with Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Radical Gastric Cancer Resection: A Randomized Controlled Trial.J Gastrointest Cancer. 2024 Feb 11. doi: 10.1007/s12029-024-01029-3. Online ahead of print. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2024. PMID: 38342837
-
Delta computed tomography radiomics features-based nomogram predicts long-term efficacy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer.Radiol Med. 2023 Apr;128(4):402-414. doi: 10.1007/s11547-023-01617-6. Epub 2023 Mar 20. Radiol Med. 2023. PMID: 36940007
-
Laparoscopic versus Open Total Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: Short and Long-Term Results.Curr Oncol. 2022 Nov 6;29(11):8442-8455. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29110665. Curr Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36354725 Free PMC article.
-
The optimal neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.Eur J Med Res. 2022 Nov 9;27(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s40001-022-00878-7. Eur J Med Res. 2022. PMID: 36352476 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
