Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
, 47 (9), 1859-1868

Chronotype, Physical Activity, and Sport Performance: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Chronotype, Physical Activity, and Sport Performance: A Systematic Review

Jacopo Antonino Vitale et al. Sports Med.

Abstract

Background: Many variables related to sport have been shown to have circadian rhythms. Chronotype is the expression of circadian rhythmicity in an individual, and three categories of chronotype are defined: morning types (M-types), evening types (E-types), and neither types (N-types). M-types show earlier peaks of several psychophysiological variables during the day than E-types. The effect of chronotype on athletic performance has not been extensively investigated.

Objective: The objective of the present review was to study the effect of chronotype on athletic performance and the psychophysiological responses to physical activity.

Methods: The present review adheres to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) reporting guidelines. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for scientific papers using the keywords "chronotype", "circadian typology", "morningness", and "eveningness" in combination with each of the words "sport", "performance", and "athletic." Relevant reference lists were inspected. We limited the search results to peer-reviewed papers published in English from 1985 to 2015.

Results: Ten papers met our inclusion criteria. Rating of perceived exertion and fatigue scores in relation to athletic performances are influenced by chronotype: M-types perceived less effort when performing a submaximal physical task in the morning than did N- and E-types. In addition, M-types generally showed better athletic performances, as measured by race times, in the morning than did N- and E-types. Other results concerning chronotype effect on physiological responses to physical activity were not always consistent: heterogeneous samples and different kinds of physical activity could partially explain these discrepancies.

Conclusions: Sports trainers and coaches should take into account the influence of both the time of day and chronotype effect when scheduling training sessions into specific time periods.

Keywords: Athletic Performance; Heart Rate Recovery; Maximum Voluntary Contraction; Race Time; Sport Performance.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 9 PubMed Central articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Int J Chronobiol. 1976;4(2):97-110 - PubMed
    1. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2013;119:155-90 - PubMed
    1. Chronobiol Int. 2015 Apr;32(3):405-15 - PubMed
    1. Hum Neurobiol. 1982;1(3):195-204 - PubMed
    1. J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Nov;22(6):1894-900 - PubMed
Feedback