High MELD score does not adversely affect outcome of living donor liver transplantation: Experience in 1000 recipients

Clin Transplant. 2017 Aug;31(8). doi: 10.1111/ctr.13006.

Abstract

In countries where deceased organ donation is scarce, there is a big gap between demand and supply of organs and living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) plays an important role in meeting this unmet need. This study was conducted to analyze the effect of pretransplant Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score on outcomes following LDLT. The outcome of 1000 patients who underwent LDLT from July 2010 to March 2015 was analyzed retrospectively. Patients were grouped into low MELD<25 and high MELD ≥25 score to compare short-term outcomes. Cumulative overall survival rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods. A total of 849 recipients were in low MELD group (Mean MELD=16.90±9.2) and 151 were in high MELD group (Mean MELD=28.77±7.2). No significant difference in etiology of CLD was observed between groups except for a higher prevalence of hepatitis C virus (29.6% vs 19.9%, P=.01) in low MELD patients. No significant difference was observed in 1-year survival (88.5% vs 84.1%, P=.12) between the groups. The multivariate analysis showed that pretransplant MELD score does not predict survival of recipients. Pretransplant high MELD score does not adversely affect outcomes after LDLT. In view of shortage of deceased organs, LDLT can be a good option in high MELD recipients.

Keywords: MELD score; liver; living donor; transplantation.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • End Stage Liver Disease / diagnosis
  • End Stage Liver Disease / mortality
  • End Stage Liver Disease / surgery*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Liver Transplantation / mortality*
  • Living Donors*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Severity of Illness Index*
  • Survival Rate
  • Treatment Outcome