Patient-reported outcome measures in urology

Curr Opin Urol. 2017 Jul;27(4):366-374. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000412.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Many urologic treatments have similar clinical outcomes, necessitating alternative methods to discriminate between options. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have become the new standard for evaluating the patient experience, and their use has drastically increased over the past decade. The purpose of this review is to discuss the status of PROMs in urology, highlight commonly used tools and address their future direction.

Recent findings: An increasing number of urology-specific PROMs tools have been developed and validated. An increased focus on patient-centered care has provided an impetus for their rise in use. Implementation of PROMs has transitioned from being primarily descriptive in nature to producing actionable findings. Many PROMs are now implemented in daily clinical practice. The future of PROMs will involve new instrument development, integration into clinical practice and the use of PROMs as performance measures.

Summary: PROMs are effective tools for characterizing symptom burden and health-related quality of life. With increasing clinical implementation, PROMs are playing an increasing role in patients' clinical decision-making.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measures*
  • Patient Satisfaction*
  • Patient-Centered Care*
  • Quality Indicators, Health Care
  • Quality of Life
  • Urology*