Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr 25;5(4):e1288.
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001288. eCollection 2017 Apr.

Greater Omental Lymph Node Flap for Upper Limb Lymphedema With Lymph Nodes-depleted Patient

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Greater Omental Lymph Node Flap for Upper Limb Lymphedema With Lymph Nodes-depleted Patient

Yu-Ying Chu et al. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: The greater omentum is supplied by the right, middle, and left omental arteries, which arise from the right and left gastroepiploic arteries. All or part of the greater omentum can be harvested based on this blood supply for free tissue transfer. It has stimulated new interest in its use as the donor site in the treatment of lymphedema. For patients who have failed other management options or have limited peripheral lymph node donor sites, the greater omental lymph node flap may offer the best chance for lymphedema treatment.

Methods: We report a 59-year-old woman with a history of left breast cancer who was treated with left modified radical mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection and developed left upper extremity Grade IV lymphedema. She received vascularized groin lymph node transfer and lymphaticovenous anastomosis, but the result was not satisfactory. She also had nasopharyngeal cancer that was treated with radiotherapy to the head and neck, making use of the submental lymph nodes flap impossible. Due to a lack of other options of lymph node donor sites, the split greater omental lymph node flap (GOLF) was used.

Results: After surgery, it showed an arm circumference reduction of 42.9% above the elbow and 36.4% below the elbow at an 8-month follow-up. There was no intraabdominal complication.

Conclusions: The split GOLF has shown good results in a peripheral lymph node-depleted lymphedema patient. Using a laparoscopic technique for flap harvest has less risk of donor site morbidity and hides scarring.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Preoperative view. The scar of previous vascularized groin lymph node on left medial elbow, and previous lymphovenous anastomosis on the dorsal wrist (black arrow).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Preoperative lymphscintigraphy. WB (whole body), AP (anteroposterior) view of upper limbs, 15 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, and 4 hours after injection, respectively.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Transfer GOLF (white star) to left distal forearm. Pedicle vein was anastomosed to radial comitant vein (white arrow).
Video Graphic 1.
Video Graphic 1.
See video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, which displays laparoscopic greater omental lymph node flap (GOLF) harvest. This video is available in the “Related Videos” section of the Full-Text article on PRSGlobalOpen.com or available at http://links.lww.com/PRSGO/A411.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Two months postoperative follow-up. The arm circumference reduction was 42.9% above the elbow and 27.3% below the elbow. Recipient vessels were the radial artery and one comitant vein (black arrow).
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Eight months postoperative follow-up. The arm circumference reduction was 42.9% above the elbow and 36.4% below the elbow.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Scars of the donor site (black arrow).

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 6 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Hansen J. Netter’s Clinical Anatomy. 20102nd ed Philadelphia: Saunders/Elsevier.
    1. Nishimura T, Kanehira E, Tsukatani T, et al. Laparoscopically harvested omental flap for head and neck reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 2002;112:930–932.. - PubMed
    1. Slavin SA, Greene AK, Borud LJ. Weinzweig J, editor. Lymphedema. In: Plastic Surgery Secrets Plus. 2009:2nd ed Philadelphia, PA: Mosby; 631–635..
    1. Lawenda BD, Mondry TE, Johnstone PA. Lymphedema: a primer on the identification and management of a chronic condition in oncologic treatment. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:8–24.. - PubMed
    1. Cheng MH, Huang JJ, Wu CW, et al. The mechanism of vascularized lymph node transfer for lymphedema: natural lymphaticovenous drainage. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133:192e–198e.. - PubMed
Feedback