Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep 1;152(9):835-842.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.1093.

Reoperation and Medicare Expenditures After Laparoscopic Gastric Band Surgery

Affiliations

Reoperation and Medicare Expenditures After Laparoscopic Gastric Band Surgery

Andrew M Ibrahim et al. JAMA Surg. .

Abstract

Importance: Following the US Food and Drug Administration approval for laparoscopic gastric band surgery in 2001, as many as 96 000 devices have been placed annually. The reported rates of reoperation range from 4% to 60% in short-term studies; however, to our knowledge, few long-term population-level data on outcomes or expenditures are known.

Objective: To describe the rate of device-related reoperations occurring after laparoscopic gastric band surgery as well as the associated payments in a longitudinal national cohort.

Design, settings, and participants: This retrospective review of 25 042 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent gastric band placement between 2006 and 2013 identifies gastric band-related reoperations, including device removal, device replacement, or revision to a different bariatric procedure (eg, a gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy). The rates of reoperation were risk adjusted using a multivariable logistic regression model that included patient age, sex, race/ethnicity, Elixhauser comorbidities, and the year that the operation was performed.

Main outcomes and measures: Rate of device-related reoperation nationally and across individual hospital referral regions. Thirty-day total episode Medicare payments to hospitals for the index operation and any subsequent reoperations.

Results: Of the 25 042 patients who underwent gastric band placement, 20 687 (82.61%) were white, 18 143 (72.45%) were women, and the mean age was 57.56 years. Patients (mean age, 57.5; 76.2% women) requiring reoperation had lower rates of hypertension (64.9% vs 73.4%; P < .001) and diabetes (40.4% vs 44.6%; P < .001) and were more likely to have their index operation at a for-profit hospital (34.6% vs 22.0%; P < .001). With an average of 4.5-year follow-up, 4636 patients (18.5%) underwent 17 539 reoperations (an average of 3.8 procedures/patient). Hospital referral regions demonstrated a 2.9-fold variation in risk- and reliability-adjusted rates of reoperation (lower quartile average, 13.3%; upper quartile average, 39.1%). During the study period, Medicare paid $470 million for laparoscopic gastric band associated procedures, of which $224 million (47.6%) of the payments were for reoperations. From 2006 to 2013, the proportion of payments from Medicare for reoperations increased from 16.4% to 77.3% of their annual spending on the gastric band device.

Conclusions and relevance: Among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing gastric band surgery, device-related reoperation was common, costly, and varied widely across hospital referral regions. These findings suggest that payers should reconsider their coverage of the gastric band device.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Dimick has a financial interest in ArborMetrix, Inc, which had no role in this analysis. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Variation in Reoperation Rates Across Hospital Referral Regions in the United States
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Annual Medicare Spending on Gastric Band Procedures

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Food and Drug Administration The lap band adjustable gastric banding system summary of safety and effectiveness data. 2001; http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf/P000008b.pdf. Accessed 19 April, 2016.
    1. Buchwald H, Oien DM. Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2008. Obes Surg. 2009;19(12):1605-1611. - PubMed
    1. The American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Estimate of bariatric surgery numbers, 2011-2015. https://asmbs.org/resources/estimate-of-bariatric-surgery-numbers. Accessed October 15, 2016.
    1. Food and Drug Administration LAP-BAND; summary of safety and effectiveness (SSED). http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf/P000008S017b.pdf. Accessed April 19, 2016.
    1. Arthurs S, Abrahamian Y, Loughren EL, Hiatt JC, Cisneros R, Weissberg J. New technology review process: the laparoscopic adjustable gastric band. Perm J. 2011;15(4):54-60. - PMC - PubMed