Improving comfort around dying in elderly people: a cluster randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 28526493
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31265-5
Improving comfort around dying in elderly people: a cluster randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Over 50% of elderly people die in acute hospital settings, where the quality of end-of-life care is often suboptimum. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of the Care Programme for the Last Days of Life (CAREFuL) at improving comfort and quality of care in the dying phase in elderly people.
Methods: We did a cluster randomised controlled trial in acute geriatric wards in ten hospitals in Flemish Region, Belgium, between Oct 1, 2012, and March 31, 2015. Hospitals were randomly assigned to implementation of CAREFuL (CAREFuL group) or to standard care (control group) using a random number generator. Patients and families were masked to interventaion allocation; hospital staff were unmasked. CAREFuL comprised a care guide for the last days of life, training, supportive documentation, and an implementation guide. Primary outcomes were comfort around dying, measured with the End-of-Life in Dementia-Comfort Assessment in Dying (CAD-EOLD), and symptom management, measured with the End-of-Life in Dementia-Symptom Management (SM-EOLD), by nurses and family carers. Analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01890239.
Findings: 451 (11%) of 4241 beds in ten hospitals were included in the analyses. Five hospitals were randomly assigned to standard health care practice and five to the CAREFuL programme; 118 patients in the control group and 164 in the CAREFuL group were eligible for assessment. Assessments were done for 132 (80%) of 164 patients in the CAREFuL group and 109 (92%) of 118 in the control group by nurses, and 48 (29%) in the CAREFuL group and 23 (19%) in the control group by family carers. Implementation of CAREFuL compared with control significantly improved nurse-assessed comfort (CAD-EOLD baseline-adjusted mean difference 4·30, 95% CI 2·07-6·53; p<0·0001). No significant differences were noted for the CAD-EOLD assessed by family carers (baseline-adjusted mean difference -0·62, 95% CI -6·07 to 4·82; p=0·82) or the SM-EOLD assessed by nurses (-0·41, -1·86 to 1·05; p=0·58) or by family carers (-0·59, -3·75 to 2·57; p=0·71).
Interpretation: Although a continuous monitoring of the programme is warranted, these results suggest that implementation of CAREFuL might improve care during the last days of life for patients in acute geriatric hospital wards.
Funding: The Flemish Government Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology and the Belgian Cancer Society "Kom Op Tegen Kanker".
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Being CAREFuL about improving end-of-life care in hospitals.Lancet. 2017 Jul 8;390(10090):97-98. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31325-9. Epub 2017 May 16. Lancet. 2017. PMID: 28526494 No abstract available.
-
[CAREFul-care programme for the last days of life].Internist (Berl). 2018 Jan;59(1):102-104. doi: 10.1007/s00108-017-0355-4. Internist (Berl). 2018. PMID: 29181553 German. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Improving end-of-life care in acute geriatric hospital wards using the Care Programme for the Last Days of Life: study protocol for a phase 3 cluster randomized controlled trial.BMC Geriatr. 2015 Feb 22;15:13. doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0010-7. BMC Geriatr. 2015. PMID: 25887959 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Liverpool Care Pathway for patients with cancer in hospital: a cluster randomised trial.Lancet. 2014 Jan 18;383(9913):226-37. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61725-0. Epub 2013 Oct 16. Lancet. 2014. PMID: 24139708 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of facilitated family case conferencing for advanced dementia: A cluster randomised clinical trial.PLoS One. 2017 Aug 7;12(8):e0181020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181020. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28786995 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
[Improving quality of end-of-life care. A possible and necessary change].Epidemiol Prev. 2011 May-Aug;35(3-4):229-33. Epidemiol Prev. 2011. PMID: 21914920 Review. Italian.
-
One Chance to Get it Right: understanding the new guidance for care of the dying person.Br Med Bull. 2015 Sep;115(1):143-50. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldv030. Epub 2015 Jul 4. Br Med Bull. 2015. PMID: 26142453 Review.
Cited by
-
Hospital-initiated palliative care interventions for adults with frailty: findings from a systematic review and narrative synthesis.Age Ageing. 2024 Sep 1;53(9):afae190. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae190. Age Ageing. 2024. PMID: 39287003 Free PMC article.
-
Uncovering Methods and Outcomes of Palliative Care for Geriatric Patients: A Scoping Review.J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Sep 27;16:2905-2920. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S429323. eCollection 2023. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023. PMID: 37790991 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Increased patient satisfaction by integration of palliative care into geriatrics-A prospective cohort study.PLoS One. 2023 Jun 22;18(6):e0287550. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287550. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37347730 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of the Care Programme for the Last Days of Life (CAREFuL) on satisfaction with care as perceived by family caregivers and geriatric nurses. A qualitative implementation study.Eur Geriatr Med. 2023 Aug;14(4):803-810. doi: 10.1007/s41999-023-00795-w. Epub 2023 May 23. Eur Geriatr Med. 2023. PMID: 37219725
-
Needs-based triggers for timely referral to palliative care for older adults severely affected by noncancer conditions: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Mar 9;22(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01131-6. BMC Palliat Care. 2023. PMID: 36890522 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
