Canaries in a coal-mine? What the killings of journalists tell us about future repression
- PMID: 28546646
- PMCID: PMC5427995
- DOI: 10.1177/0022343316680859
Canaries in a coal-mine? What the killings of journalists tell us about future repression
Abstract
An independent press that is free from government censorship is regarded as instrumental to ensuring human rights protection. Yet governments across the globe often target journalists when their reports seem to offend them or contradict their policies. Can the government's infringements of the rights of journalists tell us anything about its wider human rights agenda? The killing of a journalist is a sign of deteriorating respect for human rights. If a government orders the killing of a journalist, it is willing to use extreme measures to eliminate the threat posed by the uncontrolled flow of information. If non-state actors murder journalists, it reflects insecurity, which can lead to a backlash by the government, again triggering state-sponsored repression. To test the argument whether the killing of journalists is a precursor to increasing repression, we introduce a new global dataset on killings of journalists between 2002 and 2013 that uses three different sources that track such events across the world. The new data show that mostly local journalists are targeted and that in most cases the perpetrators remain unconfirmed. Particularly in countries with limited repression, human rights conditions are likely to deteriorate in the two years following the killing of a journalist. When journalists are killed, human rights conditions are unlikely to improve where standard models of human rights would expect an improvement. Our research underlines the importance of taking the treatment of journalists seriously, not only because failure to do so endangers their lives and limits our understanding of events on the ground, but also because their physical safety is an important precursor of more repression in the future.
Keywords: human rights; journalists; political violence; press freedom; repression.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Lead poisoning in China: a health and human rights crisis.Health Hum Rights. 2012 Dec 15;14(2):74-86. Health Hum Rights. 2012. PMID: 23568949
-
Media ownership and news framing: an analysis of HIV/AIDS coverage by Ugandan press.Afr J AIDS Res. 2012 Dec;11(4):361-71. doi: 10.2989/16085906.2012.754837. Afr J AIDS Res. 2012. PMID: 25860196
-
Protecting the human right to freedom of expression in international law.Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Feb;20(1):12-15. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2018.1392612. Epub 2017 Nov 10. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018. PMID: 29124945
-
Turning free speech into corporate speech: Philip Morris' efforts to influence U.S. and European journalists regarding the U.S. EPA report on secondhand smoke.Prev Med. 2004 Sep;39(3):568-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.02.014. Prev Med. 2004. PMID: 15313097 Review.
-
Post-mortem as preventative medicine in Papua New Guinea: a case in point.Rural Remote Health. 2015 Oct-Dec;15(4):2861. Epub 2015 Oct 31. Rural Remote Health. 2015. PMID: 26518185 Review.
References
-
- Bearak Barry. (2009) Mayor declares a coup in Madagascar. New York Times, 31 January.
-
- Brandt Patrick T, Freeman John R, Schrodt Philip A. (2014) Evaluating forecasts of political conflict dynamics. International Journal of Forecasting 30(4): 944–962.
-
- Bueno de Mesquita Bruce, Downs George W, Smith Alastair, Cherif Feryal M. (2005) Thinking inside the box: A closer look at democracy and human rights. International Studies Quarterly 49(3): 439–457.
-
- Carey Sabine C. (2010) The use of repression as a response to domestic dissent. Political Studies 58(1): 167–186.
-
- Carey Sabine C, Colaresi Michael P, Mitchell Neil J. (2015) Governments, informal links to militias, and accountability. Journal of Conflict Resolution 59(5): 850–876.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources