Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 May 26;17(1):518.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4415-4.

Comparing Motivational, Self-Regulatory and Habitual Processes in a Computer-Tailored Physical Activity Intervention in Hospital Employees - Protocol for the PATHS Randomised Controlled Trial

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparing Motivational, Self-Regulatory and Habitual Processes in a Computer-Tailored Physical Activity Intervention in Hospital Employees - Protocol for the PATHS Randomised Controlled Trial

Dominika Kwasnicka et al. BMC Public Health. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: Most people do not engage in sufficient physical activity to confer health benefits and to reduce risk of chronic disease. Healthcare professionals frequently provide guidance on physical activity, but often do not meet guideline levels of physical activity themselves. The main objective of this study is to develop and test the efficacy of a tailored intervention to increase healthcare professionals' physical activity participation and quality of life, and to reduce work-related stress and absenteeism. This is the first study to compare the additive effects of three forms of a tailored intervention using different techniques from behavioural theory, which differ according to their focus on motivational, self-regulatory and/or habitual processes.

Methods/design: Healthcare professionals (N = 192) will be recruited from four hospitals in Perth, Western Australia, via email lists, leaflets, and posters to participate in the four group randomised controlled trial. Participants will be randomised to one of four conditions: (1) education only (non-tailored information only), (2) education plus intervention components to enhance motivation, (3) education plus components to enhance motivation and self-regulation, and (4) education plus components to enhance motivation, self-regulation and habit formation. All intervention groups will receive a computer-tailored intervention administered via a web-based platform and will receive supporting text-messages containing tailored information, prompts and feedback relevant to each condition. All outcomes will be assessed at baseline, and at 3-month follow-up. The primary outcome assessed in this study is physical activity measured using activity monitors. Secondary outcomes include: quality of life, stress, anxiety, sleep, and absenteeism. Website engagement, retention, preferences and intervention fidelity will also be evaluated as well as potential mediators and moderators of intervention effect.

Discussion: This is the first study to examine a tailored, technology-supported intervention aiming to increase physical activity in healthcare professionals. The study will evaluate whether including additional theory-based behaviour change techniques aimed at promoting motivation, self-regulation and habit will lead to increased physical activity participation relative to information alone. The online platform developed in this study has potential to deliver efficient, scalable and personally-relevant intervention that can be translated to other occupational settings.

Trial registration: Australian New-Zealand Clinical Trial Registry: ACTRN12616000462482, submitted 29/03/2016, prospectively registered 8/04/2016.

Keywords: Behaviour change; Behaviour maintenance; Computer-tailoring; Habit; Healthcare professionals; Physical activity; Randomised controlled trial; Web-based.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT flow diagram [91]
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
PATHS study – intervention screenshots – content examples

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 3 articles

References

    1. Das P, Horton R. Rethinking our approach to physical activity. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):189–190. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61024-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kohl HW, et al. The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):294–305. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60898-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Warburton DE, Nicol CW, Bredin SS. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. Can Med Assoc J. 2006;174(6):801–809. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.051351. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Penedo FJ, Dahn JR. Exercise and well-being: a review of mental and physical health benefits associated with physical activity. Curr OpinPsychiatry. 2005;18(2):189–193. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. 2015 [23rd September 2015]; Available from: http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/factsheet_recommendations/en/.

Publication types

Feedback