METHODS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF COMPARATIVE DATA IN EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
- PMID: 28564168
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1991.tb04375.x
METHODS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF COMPARATIVE DATA IN EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Abstract
Inferences regarding phylogenetic patterns and constraints on the evolution of characters often can be derived only from comparisons of extant species. If the phylogeny of these species is known, then the mean phenotypes of taxa can be partitioned into heritable phylogenetic effects and nonheritable residual components. Methods are presented for the estimation of phylogenywide means of characters, the variance-covariance structure of the components of taxon-specific means, and the mean phenotypes of ancestral taxa. These methods, which are largely an extension of maximum-likelihood techniques used in quantitative genetics, make an efficient use of the data, are unbiased by phylogenetically uninformative contributions to mean phenotypes, and take into account fully the nonindependence of data resulting from evolutionary relationships. Statistical tests are introduced for evaluating the significance of phylogenetic heritability and of correlations between traits, and expressions are given for the standard errors of ancestral mean phenotype estimates. It is argued that the covariance structure of phylogenetic effects provides a description of a macroevolutionary pattern, whereas that for the residual effects, when corrected for sampling error, is more closely related to a microevolutionary pattern.
Keywords: Comparative analysis; evolutionary constraints; phylogenetic analysis.
© 1991 The Society for the Study of Evolution.
Similar articles
-
TRANSLATING BETWEEN MICROEVOLUTIONARY PROCESS AND MACROEVOLUTIONARY PATTERNS: THE CORRELATION STRUCTURE OF INTERSPECIFIC DATA.Evolution. 1996 Aug;50(4):1404-1417. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03914.x. Evolution. 1996. PMID: 28565714
-
[Foundations of the new phylogenetics].Zh Obshch Biol. 2004 Jul-Aug;65(4):334-66. Zh Obshch Biol. 2004. PMID: 15490579 Russian.
-
Quantifying and comparing phylogenetic evolutionary rates for shape and other high-dimensional phenotypic data.Syst Biol. 2014 Mar;63(2):166-77. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syt105. Epub 2013 Dec 10. Syst Biol. 2014. PMID: 24335426
-
Multivariate Phylogenetic Comparative Methods: Evaluations, Comparisons, and Recommendations.Syst Biol. 2018 Jan 1;67(1):14-31. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syx055. Syst Biol. 2018. PMID: 28633306 Review.
-
Recent developments in the analysis of comparative data.Q Rev Biol. 1988 Dec;63(4):413-40. doi: 10.1086/416027. Q Rev Biol. 1988. PMID: 3068704 Review.
Cited by
-
Assessing the Goodness of Fit of Phylogenetic Comparative Methods: A Meta-Analysis and Simulation Study.PLoS One. 2013 Jun 27;8(6):e67001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067001. Print 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23826183 Free PMC article.
-
Improving phylogenetic regression under complex evolutionary models.Ecology. 2016 Feb;97(2):286-93. doi: 10.1890/15-0086.1. Ecology. 2016. PMID: 27145604 Free PMC article.
-
Evolutionary history of plant hosts and fungal symbionts predicts the strength of mycorrhizal mutualism.Commun Biol. 2018 Aug 16;1:116. doi: 10.1038/s42003-018-0120-9. eCollection 2018. Commun Biol. 2018. PMID: 30271996 Free PMC article.
-
Assortative mating for reproductive timing affects population recruitment and resilience in a quantitative genetic model.Evol Appl. 2023 Jan 20;16(3):657-672. doi: 10.1111/eva.13524. eCollection 2023 Mar. Evol Appl. 2023. PMID: 36969143 Free PMC article.
-
Nectar traits differ between pollination syndromes in Balsaminaceae.Ann Bot. 2019 Sep 24;124(2):269-279. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcz072. Ann Bot. 2019. PMID: 31120478 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources