Adjuvant Capecitabine for Breast Cancer after Preoperative Chemotherapy
- PMID: 28564564
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1612645
Adjuvant Capecitabine for Breast Cancer after Preoperative Chemotherapy
Abstract
Background: Patients who have residual invasive carcinoma after the receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer have poor prognoses. The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients remains unclear.
Methods: We randomly assigned 910 patients with HER2-negative residual invasive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (containing anthracycline, taxane, or both) to receive standard postsurgical treatment either with capecitabine or without (control). The primary end point was disease-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival.
Results: The result of the prespecified interim analysis met the primary end point, so this trial was terminated early. The final analysis showed that disease-free survival was longer in the capecitabine group than in the control group (74.1% vs. 67.6% of the patients were alive and free from recurrence or second cancer at 5 years; hazard ratio for recurrence, second cancer, or death, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53 to 0.92; P=0.01). Overall survival was longer in the capecitabine group than in the control group (89.2% vs. 83.6% of the patients were alive at 5 years; hazard ratio for death, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.90; P=0.01). Among patients with triple-negative disease, the rate of disease-free survival was 69.8% in the capecitabine group versus 56.1% in the control group (hazard ratio for recurrence, second cancer, or death, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.87), and the overall survival rate was 78.8% versus 70.3% (hazard ratio for death, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.90). The hand-foot syndrome, the most common adverse reaction to capecitabine, occurred in 73.4% of the patients in the capecitabine group.
Conclusions: After standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy containing anthracycline, taxane, or both, the addition of adjuvant capecitabine therapy was safe and effective in prolonging disease-free survival and overall survival among patients with HER2-negative breast cancer who had residual invasive disease on pathological testing. (Funded by the Advanced Clinical Research Organization and the Japan Breast Cancer Research Group; CREATE-X UMIN Clinical Trials Registry number, UMIN000000843 .).
Comment in
-
Adjuvant Capecitabine for Breast Cancer.N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 24;377(8):791. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1708487. N Engl J Med. 2017. PMID: 28834475 No abstract available.
-
Adjuvant Capecitabine for Breast Cancer.N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 24;377(8):790-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1708487. N Engl J Med. 2017. PMID: 28836422 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Capecitabine for hormone receptor-positive versus hormone receptor-negative breast cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 26;5(5):CD011220. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011220.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34037241 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Capecitabine Maintenance Therapy Using Lower Dosage and Higher Frequency vs Observation on Disease-Free Survival Among Patients With Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Who Had Received Standard Treatment: The SYSUCC-001 Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA. 2021 Jan 5;325(1):50-58. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.23370. JAMA. 2021. PMID: 33300950 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Capecitabine versus S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage III colorectal cancer (JCOG0910): an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, phase 3, multicentre trial.Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jan;3(1):47-56. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30297-2. Epub 2017 Oct 24. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018. PMID: 29079411 Clinical Trial.
-
Capecitabine in early breast cancer: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Eur J Cancer. 2017 May;77:40-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.02.024. Epub 2017 Mar 27. Eur J Cancer. 2017. PMID: 28355581 Review.
-
Adding Adjuvant Systemic Treatment after Neoadjuvant Therapy in Breast Cancer: Review of the Data.Curr Oncol Rep. 2017 Aug;19(8):56. doi: 10.1007/s11912-017-0613-6. Curr Oncol Rep. 2017. PMID: 28733827 Review.
Cited by
-
Predicting pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer using a machine learning approach.Breast Cancer Res. 2024 Oct 29;26(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s13058-024-01905-7. Breast Cancer Res. 2024. PMID: 39472970 Free PMC article.
-
Development of an MRI Radiomic Machine-Learning Model to Predict Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Based on Fibroglandular Tissue of the Contralateral Unaffected Breast in Breast Cancer Patients.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 14;16(20):3480. doi: 10.3390/cancers16203480. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39456574 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of Neoadjuvant versus Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Survival Outcomes in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer.Curr Oncol. 2024 Oct 8;31(10):6007-6016. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31100448. Curr Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39451752 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical outcomes after post-operative radiotherapy for breast cancer patients presenting with ipsilateral supraclavicular metastasis: considerations on the cranial border of irradiation field.Breast Cancer. 2024 Oct 23. doi: 10.1007/s12282-024-01644-9. Online ahead of print. Breast Cancer. 2024. PMID: 39441499
-
Knowledge discovery of patients reviews on breast cancer drugs: Segmentation of side effects using machine learning techniques.Heliyon. 2024 Sep 26;10(19):e38563. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38563. eCollection 2024 Oct 15. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 39430478 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous