THE MEASUREMENT OF SELECTION ON QUANTITATIVE TRAITS: BIASES DUE TO ENVIRONMENTAL COVARIANCES BETWEEN TRAITS AND FITNESS
- PMID: 28568666
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1992.tb02070.x
THE MEASUREMENT OF SELECTION ON QUANTITATIVE TRAITS: BIASES DUE TO ENVIRONMENTAL COVARIANCES BETWEEN TRAITS AND FITNESS
Abstract
The use of regression techniques for estimating the direction and magnitude of selection from measurements on phenotypes has become widespread in field studies. A potential problem with these techniques is that environmental correlations between fitness and the traits examined may produce biased estimates of selection gradients. This report demonstrates that the phenotypic covariance between fitness and a trait, used as an estimate of the selection differential in estimating selection gradients, has two components: a component induced by selection itself and a component due to the effect of environmental factors on fitness. The second component is shown to be responsible for biases in estimates of selection gradients. The use of regressions involving genotypic and breeding values instead of phenotypic values can yield estimates of selection gradients that are not biased by environmental covariances. Statistical methods for estimating the coefficients of such regressions, and for testing for biases in regressions involving phenotypic values, are described.
Keywords: Biased estimates; environmental covariance; fitness; quantitative traits; selection gradients.
© 1992 The Society for the Study of Evolution.
Similar articles
-
Testing for environmentally induced bias in phenotypic estimates of natural selection: theory and practice.Am Nat. 2002 Oct;160(4):511-23. doi: 10.1086/342069. Am Nat. 2002. PMID: 18707526
-
Natural selection, evolvability and bias due to environmental covariance in the field in an annual plant.J Evol Biol. 2004 Sep;17(5):1073-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00740.x. J Evol Biol. 2004. PMID: 15312079
-
Correlates of male fitness in captive zebra finches--a comparison of methods to disentangle genetic and environmental effects.BMC Evol Biol. 2011 Nov 8;11:327. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-327. BMC Evol Biol. 2011. PMID: 22067225 Free PMC article.
-
Reducing environmental bias when measuring natural selection.Evolution. 2002 Nov;56(11):2156-67. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00140.x. Evolution. 2002. PMID: 12487346
-
Why are estimates of the strength and direction of natural selection from wild populations not congruent with observed rates of phenotypic change?Bioessays. 2016 Sep;38(9):927-34. doi: 10.1002/bies.201600017. Epub 2016 Jul 12. Bioessays. 2016. PMID: 27401716 Review.
Cited by
-
Fitness consequences of timing of migration and breeding in cormorants.PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e46165. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046165. Epub 2012 Sep 25. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 23049966 Free PMC article.
-
Integrating viability and fecundity selection to illuminate the adaptive nature of genetic clines.Evol Lett. 2017 May 3;1(1):26-39. doi: 10.1002/evl3.3. eCollection 2017 May. Evol Lett. 2017. PMID: 30283636 Free PMC article.
-
Non-additive effects of genotypic diversity increase floral abundance and abundance of floral visitors.PLoS One. 2010 Jan 14;5(1):e8711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008711. PLoS One. 2010. PMID: 20090850 Free PMC article.
-
Getting the timing right: antler growth phenology and sexual selection in a wild red deer population.Oecologia. 2010 Oct;164(2):357-68. doi: 10.1007/s00442-010-1656-7. Epub 2010 May 18. Oecologia. 2010. PMID: 20480184
-
Association analyses of host genetics, root-colonizing microbes, and plant phenotypes under different nitrogen conditions in maize.Elife. 2022 Jul 27;11:e75790. doi: 10.7554/eLife.75790. Elife. 2022. PMID: 35894213 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources