Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep 1;43(5):1011-1020.
doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbx071.

Neighborhood Influences on Violent Reoffending Risk in Released Prisoners Diagnosed With Psychotic Disorders

Free PMC article

Neighborhood Influences on Violent Reoffending Risk in Released Prisoners Diagnosed With Psychotic Disorders

Amir Sariaslan et al. Schizophr Bull. .
Free PMC article


Released prisoners diagnosed with psychotic disorders have elevated rates of violent reoffending risk and their exposure to adverse neighborhood environments may contribute to this risk. We identified all released sentenced prisoners in Sweden between 2003 and 2013 (n = 47226) and followed them up for a median period of 4.4 years. We identified prisoners who had ever been diagnosed with a psychotic disorder (n = 3782) or prescribed antipsychotics (n = 7366). We examined 3 neighborhood characteristics: income, proportion of welfare recipients, and crime rate. By fitting generalized mixed-effects and negative binomial regression models and adopting within-individual designs that controlled for all time-invariant unmeasured confounders within each individual, we estimated neighborhood intraclass correlations (ICCs) and associations between specific neighborhood characteristics and violent reoffending. Neighborhood factors explained 13.5% (95% CI: 10.9%; 16.6%) of the violent reoffending risk among released prisoners diagnosed with psychotic disorders. This contrasted with 4.3% (95% CI: 3.7%; 4.9%) in all released prisoners. However, after controlling for unmeasured confounding, these estimates were not statistically significant (ICCpsychotic disorders = 0.9%; 95% CI: -0.8%; 2.3%; ICCall prisoners = 0.3%; 95% CI: -0.02%; 0.6%). Similarly, none of the within-individual correlations between the specific neighborhood factors and violent reoffending were significantly different from zero. We found consistent results when we investigated prisoners with other psychiatric and substance use disorders. These findings suggest that placing released prisoners with psychotic disorders in less deprived neighborhoods might not reduce their violent reoffending risk, which may also apply to other psychiatric disorders. The assessment, treatment, and community linkage of high-risk prisoners as a strategy to reduce reoffending needs further research.

Keywords: causal inference; natural experiments; neighborhood effects; psychotic disorders; socioeconomic status; substance use disorders; violence.


Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Incidence rate ratios for the associations between neighborhood factors stratified across prisoners that have been prescribed medications for psychiatric and substance use disorders. Note: Neighborhood income was reverse-coded (eg, the estimates refer to the effects on violent reoffending risk following a standardized unit reduction of the neighborhood income). Model I: crude between-estimate; Model II: within-individual estimate, adjusted for age. The Model II estimate for neighborhood welfare in personality disorders was not statistically significant following Bonferroni correction for multiple testing.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 1 article


    1. Walmsley R. World Prison Population List (11th rev.). London: Institute for Criminal Policy Research; 2016.
    1. Schmitt J, Warner K. Ex-offenders and the Labor Market. Washington, DC: Center for Economic and Policy Research; 2010.
    1. Langan PA, Levin DJ. Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994. Fed Sentencing Report. 2002;15:58–65.
    1. Durose MR, Cooper AD, Snyder HN. Recidivism of Prisoners Released in 30 States in 2005: Patterns from 2005 to 2010. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2014.
    1. Fazel S, Wolf A. A systematic review of criminal recidivism rates worldwide: current difficulties and recommendations for best practice. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0130390. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types