Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug;45(8):920-938.
doi: 10.1124/dmd.117.075192. Epub 2017 Jun 6.

Development of a Novel Maternal-Fetal Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model I: Insights into Factors that Determine Fetal Drug Exposure through Simulations and Sensitivity Analyses

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Development of a Novel Maternal-Fetal Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model I: Insights into Factors that Determine Fetal Drug Exposure through Simulations and Sensitivity Analyses

Zufei Zhang et al. Drug Metab Dispos. 2017 Aug.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Determining fetal drug exposure (except at the time of birth) is not possible for both logistical and ethical reasons. Therefore, we developed a novel maternal-fetal physiologically based pharmacokinetic (m-f-PBPK) model to predict fetal exposure to drugs and populated this model with gestational age-dependent changes in maternal-fetal physiology. Then, we used this m-f-PBPK to: 1) perform a series of sensitivity analyses to quantitatively demonstrate the impact of fetoplacental metabolism and placental transport on fetal drug exposure for various drug-dosing regimens administered to the mother; 2) predict the impact of gestational age on fetal drug exposure; and 3) demonstrate that a single umbilical venous (UV)/maternal plasma (MP) ratio (even after multiple-dose oral administration to steady state) does not necessarily reflect fetal drug exposure. In addition, we verified the implementation of this m-f-PBPK model by comparing the predicted UV/MP and fetal/MP AUC ratios with those predicted at steady state after an intravenous infusion. Our simulations yielded novel insights into the quantitative contribution of fetoplacental metabolism and/or placental transport on gestational age-dependent fetal drug exposure. Through sensitivity analyses, we demonstrated that the UV/MP ratio does not measure the extent of fetal drug exposure unless obtained at steady state after an intravenous infusion or when there is little or no fluctuation in MP drug concentrations after multiple-dose oral administration. The proposed m-f-PBPK model can be used to predict fetal exposure to drugs across gestational ages and therefore provide the necessary information to assess the risk of drug toxicity to the fetus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Schematic diagram of the full m-f-PBPK model. Solid arrows indicate tissue blood flows, whereas dashed arrows indicate clearances. f/F, fetal; PD, passive diffusion; M, maternal; P, placental; A, amniotic fluid; met, metabolism; renal, renal excretion; reabsorp, amniotic fluid swallowing. CLPF/FP and CLPM/MP represent unidirectional transporter-mediated clearances.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Impact of changes in CLm0 on fetal and maternal drug X plasma concentration and UV/MP ratio. Changes in CLm0 of drug X significantly influenced maternal-fetal drug X plasma C-T profiles at week 40. (a) After infusion (16.7 mg/h, i.v.) at week 40, decreasing CLm0 from 45 l/h (red) to 4.5 l/h (blue) increased the steady-state maternal (solid lines) and fetal (dashed lines) plasma concentration of drug X as well as the time to reach steady state. Inset shows the curves on a semilogarithmic scale. (b) The corresponding UV/MP ratios indicate that at steady stateinf these ratios do not change with changes in CLm0 (45 l/h, red; 4.5 l/h, blue). (c) After a single oral dose (400 mg), increasing CLm0 from 4.5 l/h (blue) to 45 l/h (red) resulted in lower MP drug concentrations (solid lines) and subsequently lower fetal plasma drug X concentrations (dashed lines). (d) Corresponding changes in UV/MP ratio indicate that higher CLm0 (red) led to greater time-dependent fluctuations in the UV/MP ratio as well as a lager UV/MP ratio at distributional equilibrium. (e) Under a multiple oral dosing regimen (133.3 mg; τ = 8 hours) lower CLm0 (blue) not only prolonged the time to reach steady state but also resulted in greater extent of drug accumulation. (f) In addition, lower CLm0 (blue) led to fewer fluctuations in UV/MP ratio within a dosing interval compared with higher CLm0 (red). When the dosing interval was increased (400 mg; τ = 24 hours), the effect of reduction in CLm0 on drug accumulation (g) or variation in UV/MP ratio (h) was dampened. In panels (e) and (g), the predicted F/M AUC ratio remained at unity despite the changes in CLm0. See Table 3 for the clearance values used in these simulations.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Impact of changes in CLm0 on fetal and maternal drug Y plasma concentration and UV/MP ratio. Changes in CLm0 of drug Y significantly influenced maternal-fetal drug Y plasma C-T profiles at week 40. After infusion (0.625 mg/h, i.v.) at week 40, a 10-fold decrease in maternal hepatic intrinsic clearance (from 3327 to 332.7 l/h) resulted in a decrease in CLm0 from 43 l/h (red) to 12 l/h (blue). (a) The resultant steady-stateinf maternal (solid lines) and fetal (dashed lines) plasma concentration of drug Y as well as the time to reach steady state increased. (b) The corresponding UV/MP ratios indicate that at steady stateinf these ratios stay at 1.2 and do not change with varying CLm0 values (43 l/h, red; 12 l/h, blue). (c) After a single oral dose (15 mg), increasing CLm0 from 12 l/h (blue) to 43 l/h (red) resulted in lower MP drug concentrations (solid lines) and subsequently lower fetal plasma drug X concentrations (dashed lines). (d) Corresponding changes in UV/MP ratio indicate that higher CLm0 (red) led to greater fluctuations in the UV/MP ratio as well as a larger UV/MP ratio at distributional equilibrium. (e) After multiple oral doses (3.75 mg; τ = 4 hours), lower CLm0 (blue) not only prolonged the time to reach steady state but also resulted in much greater drug accumulation. (f) In addition, lower CLm0 values (blue) led to fewer fluctuations in UV/MP ratio (within a dosing interval) when compared with higher CLm0 values (red). When the dosing interval was increased (15 mg; τ = 24 hours), the effect of reduction in CLm0 on dose accumulation (g) or variations in UV/MP ratio (h) was dampened. The inset shows the curves on a semilogarithmic scale. In panels (e) and (g), the predicted unbound F/M AUC ratio remained at unity despite the changes in CLm0. See Table 4 for the clearance values used in these simulations.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Impact of changes in CLPD on fetal and maternal drug X plasma concentration and UV/MP ratio. Changes in CLPD of drug X significantly influenced the fetal (dashed lines) but not the maternal (solid lines) drug X plasma C-T profile at week 40. (a) After infusion (16.7 mg/h, i.v.) at week 40, decreasing CLPD from 18 l/h (red) to 1.8 l/h (blue) did not affect the maternal (the red and blue solid lines overlap) or fetal steady-stateinf plasma concentrations of the drug. (a and b) The corresponding UV/MP ratios indicate that at steady stateinf these ratios do not change with alterations in CLPD (18 l/h, red; 1.8 l/h, blue), but the time to reach the steady-state ratio was prolonged. (c) After a single oral dose (400 mg), increasing CLPD from 1.8 l/h (blue) to 18 l/h (red) significantly modified the shape of fetal plasma C-T curves (dashed lines) but not MP drug concentrations (solid lines; blue and red lines overlap). (d) Corresponding changes in UV/MP ratio indicate that higher CLPD values (red) not only shortened the time to reach distributional equilibrium but also reduced distributional equilibrium UV/MP ratio compared with lower CLPD (blue). After multiple oral doses (400 mg; τ = 24 hours), alterations in CLPD did not affect the MP drug X C-T curve but significantly changed the shape of fetal plasmas in the drug X C-T profile. (e) Higher CLPD values (red) resulted in greater fluctuations in fetal plasma drug X concentration within a dosing interval compared with lower CLPD values (blue). (f) In contrast, higher CLPD (red) produced fewer fluctuations in UV/MP ratio within a dosing interval compared with lower CLPD (blue). Insets in (d) and (f) show the F/M AUC ratios at lower CLPD (blue) or higher CLPD (red). The predicted F/M AUC ratio remained at unity despite changes in CLPD after single (c) or multiple (e) oral doses of drug X. See Table 3 for the clearance values used in these simulations.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Impact of changes in CLPD on fetal and maternal drug Y plasma concentration and UV/MP ratio. Changes in CLPD of drug Y significantly influenced drug Y fetal (dashed lines), but not maternal (solid lines), plasma C-T profile at week 40. (a) After infusion (0.625 mg/h, i.v.) at week 40, decreasing CLPD values from 22.5 l/h (red) to 2.25 l/h (blue) did not affect the maternal (the red and blue solid lines overlap) or fetal steady stateinf plasma concentration of the drug. (b) The corresponding UV/MP ratios indicate that at steady-stateinf these ratios do not change with alterations in CLPD (22.5 l/h, red; 2.25 l/h, blue), but the time to reach the steady-state ratio was prolonged. (c) After a single oral dose (15 mg), decreasing CLPD from 22.5 l/h (red) to 2.25 l/h (blue) significantly modified the shape of fetal plasma C-T curve (dashed lines) but not MP drug concentrations (solid lines; blue and red lines overlap). (d) Corresponding changes in UV/MP ratio indicate that higher CLPD values (red) not only shortened the time to reach distributional equilibrium but also reduced distributional equilibrium UV/MP ratio compared with lower CLPD (blue). Under a multiple oral dosing regimen (15 mg; τ = 24 hours), alterations in CLPD values did not affect the MP drug Y C-T curve but significantly changed the shape of the fetal plasma drug Y C-T profile. (e) Higher CLPD values (red) resulted in greater fluctuations in fetal plasma drug Y concentration within a dosing interval compared with lower CLPD values (blue). (f) In contrast, higher CLPD values (red) produced fewer fluctuations in UV/MP ratio within a dosing interval compared with lower CLPD values (blue) as transplacental distributional equilibirum of drug Y was quickly attained after an oral dose. Insets in (d) and (f) show the unbound F/M AUC ratios at lower CLPD (blue) or higher CLPD (red). The predicted unbound F/M AUC ratio remained at unity despite changes in CLPD after single (c) or multiple (e) oral doses of drug Y. See Table 4 for the clearance values used in these simulations.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Impact of changes in feto-placental metabolism and placental transport on fetal plasma and placental drug X concentration, P/M AUC, F/M AUC, and UV/MP ratios after a single 400-mg oral dose of drug X. Changes in fetoplacental clearance pathways differentially impacted fetal exposure to drug X, P/M plasma AUC ratio (hatched bar), F/M plasma AUC ratio (solid bar), and the UV/MP ratio after a single 400-mg oral dose of drug X at week 40. The CLPD of drug X was held at 1.8 l/h. The clearance pathway variance is indicated at the extreme left of the first panel of each row. The indicated clearance was set at 0, 0.18, 0.9, or 1.8 l/h, respectively (0%, 10%, 50%, or 100% of CLPD; black, red, green, and blue lines, respectively). Other than CLMP (d1), increasing any of the indicated clearance pathways resulted in lower fetal plasma drug X concentrations (a1–c1 and e1). When CLf0 was present, the resultant F/M plasma AUC ratio was lower (b2 and c2) than when only CLP0 was present (a2). In all cases, the predicted UV/MP ratio at distributional equilibrium was significantly greater than its steady-stateinf value (Supplemental eq. 1). The UV/MP ratio at distributional equilibrium decreased with an increase in CLp0, CLf0,CLf0 plus CLp0, or CLPM (a3, b3, c3, and e3, respectively) and increased with an increase in CLMP (d3). See Table 3 for the clearance values used in these simulations.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.
Impact of changes in fetoplacental metabolism and placental transport on fetal plasma and placental drug Y concentrations, and P/M AUC, F/M AUC, and UV/MP ratios after a single 15-mg oral dose of drug Y. Changes in fetoplacental clearance pathways differentially impacted fetal exposure to drug Y, P/M plasma unbound AUC ratio (hatched bar), F/M plasma unbound AUC ratio (solid bar), and the UV/MP ratio after a single 15-mg oral dose of drug Y at week 40. The CLPD of drug Y was held at 22.5 l/h. The clearance pathway varied is indicated at the extreme left of the first panel of each row. The indicated clearance was set at 0, 2.25, 11.3, or 22.5 l/h, respectively (0%, 10%, 50%, or 100% of CLPD; black, red, green, and blue lines, respectively). Other than CLMP (d1), increasing any of the indicated clearance pathways resulted in lower fetal plasma drug X concentrations (a1–c1 and e1). When CLf0 was present, the F/M plasma unbound AUC ratio was lower (b2 and c2) than when only CLP0 was present (a2). In all cases, the predicted UV/MP ratio at distributional equilibrium was greater than its expected steady-stateinf value (Supplemental eq. 1). The UV/MP ratio at distributional equilibrium decreased with an increase in CLp0, CLf0, CLf0 plus CLp0, or CLPM (a3, b3, c3, and e3, respectively) and increased with an increase in CLMP (d3). See Table 4 for the clearance values used in these simulations.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 8.
Impact of GA on maternal and fetal drug X plasma concentration and F/M AUC ratio after a single 400-mg oral dose of drug X at week 20 (red) or week 40 (blue). The effect of GA on fetal exposure to drug X varies with fetoplacental clearance mechanisms involved. Maternal (solid) and fetal (dashed) C-T profiles as well as F/M plasma AUC ratios were simulated after a single 400 mg oral dose of drug X at week 20 (red) and week 40 (blue) under different scenarios. In scenario 1, where no irreversible loss of drug X occurred in the fetoplacental unit, the advancement of GA did not significantly affect fetal-maternal drug disposition (a) or the F/M plasma AUC ratio of unity (b). In scenario 2, the addition of fetal metabolism (increased proportionally with the fetal body volume as GA increased) significantly reduced fetal plasma drug concentrations (c versus a) and resulted in an ∼50% decrease in F/M AUC plasma ratio at both GAs (d). In scenario 3, placental P-gp efflux clearance decreased with GA (based on reported P-gp expression and changes in placental volume with GA). Consequently, fetal exposure to drug X increased with GA, reflected by higher fetal plasma drug concentrations (e) and increased F/M plasma AUC ratios (f). Finally, in scenario 4, where both fetal metabolism and placental efflux were present, a further reduction in fetal exposure was observed at both GAs (g and h). See Table 3 and Table 5 for the clearance values used in these simulations.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 9.
Impact of GA on maternal and fetal drug Y plasma concentration and F/M AUC ratio after a single 15-mg oral dose of drug Y at week 20 (red) and week 40 (blue). The effect of GA on fetal exposure to drug Y varies with the fetoplacental clearance mechanisms involved. Maternal (solid) and fetal (dashed) C-T profiles, maternal (solid) and fetal (hatched) plasma AUCs, as well as F/M [total (solid) and unbound (hatched)] AUC ratios were simulated after a single 15-mg oral dose of drug Y at week 20 (red) and week 40 (blue) under different scenarios. In scenario 1, where no irreversible loss of drug Y occurred in the fetoplacental unit under a constant maternal hepatic unbound intrinsic clearance (CLint,u,hep), the advancement of GA resulted in an increased fetal plasma AUC despite the decrease in MP AUC (a and b) but did not affect the F/M plasma AUC unbound ratio of unity (c). In scenario 2, the assumed 100% higher CLint,u,hep at week 40 compared with week 20 significantly decreased maternal-fetal plasma drug Y concentrations (hence, AUCs) at term (d versus a; e versus b), whereas F/M AUC plasma ratios at both GAs were identical to those in scenario 1 (f versus c). In scenario 3, placental P-gp–mediated efflux clearance decreased with GA. Consequently, fetal exposure to drug Y increased with GA, which is reflected by higher fetal plasma drug concentrations (g) and increased F/M plasma AUC ratios (i). Finally, in scenario 4, the increase in fetal exposure from week 20 to week 40 persisted in the presence of both a decrease in placental efflux and an increase in CLm0 with GA, but to a smaller extent compared with scenario 3 (k versus h). Note that F/M AUC plasma ratios at both GAs were identical to those in scenario 3 (l versus i). See Table 4 and Table 5 for the clearance values used in these simulations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abduljalil K, Furness P, Johnson TN, Rostami-Hodjegan A, Soltani H. (2012) Anatomical, physiological and metabolic changes with gestational age during normal pregnancy: a database for parameters required in physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling. Clin Pharmacokinet 51:365–396. - PubMed
    1. Acharya G, Erkinaro T, Mäkikallio K, Lappalainen T, Rasanen J. (2004) Relationships among Doppler-derived umbilical artery absolute velocities, cardiac function, and placental volume blood flow and resistance in fetal sheep. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 286:H1266–H1272. - PubMed
    1. Arant BS., Jr (1978) Developmental patterns of renal functional maturation compared in the human neonate. J Pediatr 92:705–712. - PubMed
    1. Archie JG, Collins JS, Lebel RR. (2006) Quantitative standards for fetal and neonatal autopsy. Am J Clin Pathol 126:256–265. - PubMed
    1. Barry M, Back D, Ormesher S, Beeching N, Nye F. (1993) Metabolism of didanosine (ddI) by erythrocytes: pharmacokinetic implications. Br J Clin Pharmacol 36:87–88. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources