Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Filters applied. Clear all
Randomized Controlled Trial
, 31 (12), 5411-5417

The Effects of Laparoscopic Graspers With Enhanced Haptic Feedback on Applied Forces: A Randomized Comparison With Conventional Graspers

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The Effects of Laparoscopic Graspers With Enhanced Haptic Feedback on Applied Forces: A Randomized Comparison With Conventional Graspers

Chantal C J Alleblas et al. Surg Endosc.

Abstract

Background: Haptic feedback, which enables surgeons to perceive information on interaction forces between instrument and tissue, is deficient in laparoscopic surgery. This information, however, is essential for accurate tissue manipulation and recognition of tissue consistencies. To this end, a laparoscopic grasper with enhanced haptic feedback has been developed: the force reflecting operation instrument (FROI). This study tested the effects of enhanced haptic feedback on force control, tissue consistency interpretation, and the associated surgeons' level of confidence through a randomized controlled crossover experiment.

Methods: A randomized three-period crossover trial was conducted, in which seven surgical residents and 13 medical students participated. The setup involved a box trainer in which slices of porcine organs (lung, small intestine, or liver) were presented. Participants performed three series of blinded palpation tasks involving three different graspers: the conventional grasper, the FROI with enhanced haptic feedback activated, and the FROI with enhanced haptic feedback deactivated. In each series, nine pairs of organ tissues were palpated to compare consistencies. The orders of presenting both instruments and tissues were randomized.

Results: The force applied during tissue palpation significantly decreased, by a mean factor of 3.1 with enhanced haptic feedback. Tissue consistency interpretation was significantly improved with more correct assessments and participants answered with significantly more confidence when enhanced haptic feedback was available.

Conclusion: The availability of enhanced haptic feedback enabled participants to operate with significantly reduced interaction force between instrument and tissues. This observation is expected to have multiple important clinical implications, such as less tissue damage, fewer complications, shorter operation times, and improved ergonomics.

Keywords: Experimental research; Haptic feedback; Innovation; Laparoscopy; Technology; Usability.

Conflict of interest statement

Chantal C.J. Alleblas, Sjors F.P.J. Coppus, and Theodoor E. Nieboer declare no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose. Michel P.H. Vleugels is an inventor of haptic feedback instruments.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Experimental setup of the box trainer. The participant stands on the left for holding the grasper, and the instructor on the right for placing the tissues in front of the grasper tip
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The force reflecting operation instrument (handle type: back hinged scissors)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Force application during tissue palpation. These recordings of one participant show forces applied with the FROI with enhanced haptic feedback activated (left) and forces applied with enhanced haptic feedback deactivated (right)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Distribution of the level of self-reported confidence on a 5-point Likert scale for each type of grasper

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Berguer R. Surgery and ergonomics. Arch Surg. 1999;134:1011–1016. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.134.9.1011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cuschieri A. Whither minimal access surgery: tribulations and expectations. Am J Surg. 1995;169:9–19. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80104-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mettler L, Clevin L, Ternamian A, Puntambekar S, Schollmeyer T, Alkatout I. The past, present and future of minimally invasive endoscopy in gynecology: a review and speculative outlook. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2013;22:210–226. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2013.823451. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sorensen SM, Savran MM, Konge L, Bjerrum F. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional vision in laparoscopy: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:11–23. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4189-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gala RB, Margulies R, Steinberg A, Murphy M, Lukban J, Jeppson P, Aschkenazi S, Olivera C, South M, Lowenstein L, Schaffer J, Balk EM, Sung V, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons Systematic Review Group Systematic review of robotic surgery in gynecology: robotic techniques compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21:353–361. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.11.010. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback