Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
, 7 (6), e014912

Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Treatments for Major Depressive Disorder: Review of Systematic Reviews

Affiliations
Review

Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Treatments for Major Depressive Disorder: Review of Systematic Reviews

Gerald Gartlehner et al. BMJ Open.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to summarise the evidence on more than 140 pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment options for major depressive disorder (MDD) and to evaluate the confidence that patients and clinicians can have in the underlying science about their effects.

Design: This is a review of systematic reviews.

Data sources: This study used MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and Epistemonikos from 2011 up to February 2017 for systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials in adult patients with acute-phase MDD.

Methods: We dually reviewed abstracts and full-text articles, rated the risk of bias of eligible systematic reviews and graded the strength of evidence.

Results: Nineteen systematic reviews provided data on 28 comparisons of interest. For general efficacy, only second-generation antidepressants were supported with high strength evidence, presenting small beneficial treatment effects (standardised mean difference: -0.35; 95% CI -0.31 to -0.38), and a statistically significantly higher rate of discontinuation because of adverse events than patients on placebo (relative risk (RR) 1.88; 95% CI 1.0 to 3.28).Only cognitive behavioural therapy is supported by reliable evidence (moderate strength of evidence) to produce responses to treatment similar to those of second-generation antidepressants (45.5% vs 44.2%; RR 1.10; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.30). All remaining comparisons of non-pharmacological treatments with second-generation antidepressants either led to inconclusive results or had substantial methodological shortcomings (low or insufficient strength of evidence).

Conclusions: In contrast to pharmacological treatments, the majority of non-pharmacological interventions for treating patients with MDD are not evidence based. For patients with strong preferences against pharmacological treatments, clinicians should focus on therapies that have been compared directly with antidepressants.

Trial registration number: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registration number: 42016035580.

Keywords: antidepressants; cognitive behavioral therapy; complementary and alternative medicine; depression; exercise; psychological therapy; systematic review..

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of review of systematic reviews of treatments for major depressive disorder in adults.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overview of the strength of evidence of non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions compared with inactive interventions for the treatment of adult major depressive disorder. CBT, cognitive behavioural therapy; SAMe, S-adenosyl-L-methionine; SGA, second-generation antidepressants; SMD, standardised mean difference; TCA, tricyclic antidepressants.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Absolute risk reductions or increases of overall discontinuation or discontinuation because of adverse events comparing non-pharmacological interventions with inactive interventions. CBT, cognitive behavioural therapy; SAMe, S-adenosyl-L-methionine; SGA, second-generation antidepressants; TCA, tricyclic antidepressants.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Absolute risk reductions or increases of response to treatment comparing non-pharmacological interventions with second-generation antidepressants for the treatment of adult major depressive disorder. 1Number of participants in trials that directly compared intervention with second-generation antidepressants. 2Number of trials in network meta-analysis that contributed to the effect estimate. CBT, cognitive behavioural therapy; RR, relative risk; SAMe, S-adenosyl-L-methionine; SGA, second-generation antidepressants.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 9 PubMed Central articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed VA, Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2013.
    1. Wittchen HU, Jacobi F, Rehm J, et al. The size and burden of mental disorders and other disorders of the brain in Europe 2010. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2011;21:655–79. 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2011.07.018 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, et al. The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: results from the National Comorbidity Survey replication (NCS-R). JAMA 2003;289:3095–105. 10.1001/jama.289.23.3095 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fendrich M, Avci O, Johnson TP, et al. Depression, substance use and HIV risk in a probability sample of men who have sex with men. Addict Behav 2013;38:1715–8. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.09.005 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Silberbogen AK, Busby AK, Ulloa EW. Impact of psychological distress on prostate cancer screening in U.S. Military Veterans. Am J Mens Health 2014;8:399–408. 10.1177/1557988313516357 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback