Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr;37(4):467-476.
doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2017.05.017. Epub 2017 May 23.

Cardiac rehabilitation and readmissions after heart transplantation

Affiliations

Cardiac rehabilitation and readmissions after heart transplantation

Justin M Bachmann et al. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is under-utilized. CR is indicated after heart transplantation, but there are no data regarding CR participation in transplant recipients. We characterized current CR utilization among heart transplant recipients in the United States and the association of CR with 1-year readmissions using the 2013-2014 Medicare files.

Methods: The study population included Medicare beneficiaries enrolled due to disability (patients on the transplant list are eligible for disability benefits under Medicare regulations) or age ≥65 years. We identified heart transplant patients by diagnosis codes and cumulative CR sessions occurring within 1 year after the transplant hospitalization.

Results: There were 2,531 heart transplant patients in the USA in 2013, of whom 595 (24%) received Medicare coverage and were included in the study. CR utilization was low, with 326 patients (55%) participating in CR programs. The Midwest had the highest proportion of transplant recipients initiating CR (68%, p = 0.001). Patients initiating CR attended a mean of 26.7 (standard deviation 13.3) sessions, less than the generally prescribed program of 36 sessions. Transplant recipients age 35 to 49 years were less likely to initiate CR (odds ratio [OR] 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23 to 0.66, p < 0.001) and attended 8.2 fewer sessions (95% CI 3.5 to 12.9, p < 0.001) than patients age ≥65 years. CR participation was associated with a 29% lower 1-year readmission risk (95% CI 13% to 42%, p = 0.001).

Conclusions: Only half of cardiac transplant recipients participate in CR, and those who do have a lower 1-year readmission risk. These data invite further study on barriers to CR in this population.

Keywords: cardiac rehabilitation; cardiac transplantation; health services research; heart transplantation; readmissions; rehabilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure statement: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. The content is the responsibility of the authors alone and does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the supporting agencies, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Person-time approach (Mantel–Byar method) to defining cardiac rehabilitation (CR) participation status in modeling the association of CR with readmissions. In CR participants, the time between hospital discharge and CR initiation (immortal person-time) is classified as CR non-participation until CR initiation and CR participation thereafter.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cumulative readmissions over time for Medicare beneficiaries receiving heart transplants in 2013, stratified by participation in cardiac rehabilitation. Cumulative readmissions were calculated using the Andersen–Gill model with a robust sandwich covariance estimator adjusted for age, gender, race, census region, comorbidities, discharge to an inpatient rehabilitation facility or skilled nursing facility, and previous ventricular assist device. Shaded areas represent 95% confidence intervals.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Thomas RJ, King M, Lui K, et al. AACVPR/ACCF/AHA 2010 update: Performance measures on cardiac rehabilitation for referral to cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention services: a report of the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures (Writing Committee to Develop Clinical Performance Measures for Cardiac Rehabilitation) J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2010;30:279–88. - PubMed
    1. Thomas RJ, King M, Lui K, et al. AACVPR/ACC/AHA 2007 performance measures on cardiac rehabilitation for referral to and delivery of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention services endorsed by the American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Sports Medicine, American Physical Therapy Association, Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation, European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation, Inter-American Heart Foundation, National Association of Clinical Nurse Specialists, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:1400–33. - PubMed
    1. Anderson L, Oldridge N, Thompson DR, et al. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:1–12. - PubMed
    1. Hammill BG, Curtis LH, Schulman KA, et al. Relationship between cardiac rehabilitation and long-term risks of death and myocardial infarction among elderly Medicare beneficiaries. Circulation. 2010;121:63–70. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Suaya JA, Stason WB, Ades PA, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation and survival in older coronary patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:25–33. - PubMed

Publication types