Post-operative 3D CT feedback improves accuracy and precision in the learning curve of anatomic ACL femoral tunnel placement

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Feb;26(2):468-477. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4614-7. Epub 2017 Jun 19.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the feedback from post-operative three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) on femoral tunnel placement in the learning process, to obtain an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Methods: A series of 60 consecutive patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction using autologous hamstrings single-bundle outside-in technique were prospectively included in the study. ACL reconstructions were performed by the same trainee-surgeon during his learning phase of anatomic ACL femoral tunnel placement. A CT scan with dedicated tunnel study was performed in all patients within 48 h after surgery. The data obtained from the CT scan were processed into a three-dimensional surface model, and a true medial view of the lateral femoral condyle was used for the femoral tunnel placement analysis. Two independent examiners analysed the tunnel placements. The centre of femoral tunnel was measured using a quadrant method as described by Bernard and Hertel. The coordinates measured were compared with anatomic coordinates values described in the literature [deep-to-shallow distance (X-axis) 28.5%; high-to-low distance (Y-axis) 35.2%]. Tunnel placement was evaluated in terms of accuracy and precision. After each ACL reconstruction, results were shown to the surgeon to receive an instant feedback in order to achieve accurate correction and improve tunnel placement for the next surgery. Complications and arthroscopic time were also recorded.

Results: Results were divided into three consecutive series (1, 2, 3) of 20 patients each. A trend to placing femoral tunnel slightly shallow in deep-to-shallow distance and slightly high in high-to-low distance was observed in the first and the second series. A progressive improvement in tunnel position was recorded from the first to second series and from the second to the third series. Both accuracy (+52.4%) and precision (+55.7%) increased from the first to the third series (p < 0.001). Arthroscopic time decreased from a mean of 105 min in the first series to 57 min in the third series (p < 0.001). After 50 ACL reconstructions, a satisfactory anatomic femoral tunnel was reached.

Conclusion: Feedback from post-operative 3D-CT is effective in the learning process to improve accuracy and precision of femoral tunnel placement in order to obtain anatomic ACL reconstruction and helps to reduce also arthroscopic time and learning curve. For clinical relevance, trainee-surgeons should use feedback from post-operative 3DCT to learn anatomic ACL femoral tunnel placement and apply it appropriately.

Level of evidence: Consecutive case series, Level IV.

Keywords: 3D-CT; ACL reconstruction; Accuracy; Anterior cruciate ligament; Feedback; Femoral tunnel; Learning curve; Outside-in technique; Precision; Quadrant method.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries / surgery*
  • Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction / education*
  • Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction / standards
  • Clinical Competence / standards
  • Epiphyses / surgery
  • Female
  • Femur / diagnostic imaging*
  • Femur / surgery*
  • Formative Feedback
  • Hamstring Muscles / transplantation
  • Humans
  • Imaging, Three-Dimensional
  • Knee Joint / diagnostic imaging
  • Knee Joint / surgery
  • Learning Curve*
  • Male
  • Postoperative Period
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed*
  • Young Adult