Trial of Electrical Direct-Current Therapy versus Escitalopram for Depression
- PMID: 28657871
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1612999
Trial of Electrical Direct-Current Therapy versus Escitalopram for Depression
Abstract
Background: We compared transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) with a selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor for the treatment of depression.
Methods: In a single-center, double-blind, noninferiority trial involving adults with unipolar depression, we randomly assigned patients to receive tDCS plus oral placebo, sham tDCS plus escitalopram, or sham tDCS plus oral placebo. The tDCS was administered in 30-minute, 2-mA prefrontal stimulation sessions for 15 consecutive weekdays, followed by 7 weekly treatments. Escitalopram was given at a dose of 10 mg per day for 3 weeks and 20 mg per day thereafter. The primary outcome measure was the change in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) score (range, 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating more depression). Noninferiority of tDCS versus escitalopram was defined by a lower boundary of the confidence interval for the difference in the decreased score that was at least 50% of the difference in the scores with placebo versus escitalopram.
Results: A total of 245 patients underwent randomization, with 91 being assigned to escitalopram, 94 to tDCS, and 60 to placebo. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the mean (±SD) decrease in the score from baseline was 11.3±6.5 points in the escitalopram group, 9.0±7.1 points in the tDCS group, and 5.8±7.9 points in the placebo group. The lower boundary of the confidence interval for the difference in the decrease for tDCS versus escitalopram (difference, -2.3 points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -4.3 to -0.4; P=0.69) was lower than the noninferiority margin of -2.75 (50% of placebo minus escitalopram), so noninferiority could not be claimed. Escitalopram and tDCS were both superior to placebo (difference vs. placebo, 5.5 points [95% CI, 3.1 to 7.8; P<0.001] and 3.2 points [95% CI, 0.7 to 5.5; P=0.01], respectively). Patients receiving tDCS had higher rates of skin redness, tinnitus, and nervousness than did those in the other two groups, and new-onset mania developed in 2 patients in the tDCS group. Patients receiving escitalopram had more frequent sleepiness and obstipation than did those in the other two groups.
Conclusions: In a single-center trial, tDCS for the treatment of depression did not show noninferiority to escitalopram over a 10-week period and was associated with more adverse events. (Funded by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo and others; ELECT-TDCS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01894815 .).
Comment in
-
Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Depression - The Devil Is in the Dosing.N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 29;376(26):2593-2594. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1702492. N Engl J Med. 2017. PMID: 28657865 No abstract available.
-
Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation as a treatment for depression.J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2017 Sep;47(3):253-255. doi: 10.4997/JRCPE.2017.309. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2017. PMID: 29465102 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Trial of Psilocybin versus Escitalopram for Depression.N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 15;384(15):1402-1411. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2032994. N Engl J Med. 2021. PMID: 33852780 Clinical Trial.
-
The Escitalopram versus Electric Current Therapy for Treating Depression Clinical Study (ELECT-TDCS): rationale and study design of a non-inferiority, triple-arm, placebo-controlled clinical trial.Sao Paulo Med J. 2015 May-Jun;133(3):252-63. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2014.00351712. Epub 2015 Jun 1. Sao Paulo Med J. 2015. PMID: 26176930 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The sertraline vs. electrical current therapy for treating depression clinical study: results from a factorial, randomized, controlled trial.JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Apr;70(4):383-91. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamapsychiatry.32. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013. PMID: 23389323 Clinical Trial.
-
Novel Augmentation Strategies in Major Depression.Dan Med J. 2017 Apr;64(4):B5338. Dan Med J. 2017. PMID: 28385173 Review.
-
Efficacy of escitalopram in the treatment of social anxiety disorder: A meta-analysis versus placebo.Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016 Jun;26(6):1062-9. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2016.02.013. Epub 2016 Feb 27. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016. PMID: 26971233 Review.
Cited by
-
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined With Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2444306. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44306. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 39535797 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Targeting Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex and Orbitofrontal Cortex on Somatic Symptoms in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Clinical Trial.CNS Neurosci Ther. 2024 Nov;30(11):e70110. doi: 10.1111/cns.70110. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2024. PMID: 39516668 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Machine learning-optimized non-invasive brain stimulation and treatment response classification for major depression.Bioelectron Med. 2024 Oct 30;10(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s42234-024-00157-2. Bioelectron Med. 2024. PMID: 39473014 Free PMC article.
-
Home-based transcranial direct current stimulation treatment for major depressive disorder: a fully remote phase 2 randomized sham-controlled trial.Nat Med. 2024 Oct 21. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03305-y. Online ahead of print. Nat Med. 2024. PMID: 39433921
-
Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as an Add-On Trial Treatment for Acute Bipolar Depression Patients With Suicidal Ideation.CNS Neurosci Ther. 2024 Oct;30(10):e70077. doi: 10.1111/cns.70077. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2024. PMID: 39385316 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources