A Comparison of Outcomes from In Vitro Fertilization Cycles Stimulated with Follicle Stimulating Hormone Plus either Recombinant Luteinizing Hormone or Human Menopausal Gonadotropins in Subjects Treated with Long Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Agonist Protocols
- PMID: 28670424
- PMCID: PMC5347454
- DOI: 10.22074/ijfs.2017.4759
A Comparison of Outcomes from In Vitro Fertilization Cycles Stimulated with Follicle Stimulating Hormone Plus either Recombinant Luteinizing Hormone or Human Menopausal Gonadotropins in Subjects Treated with Long Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Agonist Protocols
Abstract
Background: This study compared rates of pregnancy and in vitro fertilization (IVF) parameters in subjects stimulated with follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) plus either recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-LH) or human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) in a long gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist IVF protocol.
Materials and methods: This cohort study enrolled patients who underwent IVF stimu- lation with a long GnRH agonist protocol and received FSH plus r-LH or hMG. Outcomes measured included: FSH and LH doses, number of oocytes and embryos obtained, pregnancy rate per cycle, and clinical pregnancy rate per cycle. Stepwise logistic regression was performed on continuous and categorical variables to control for confounding effects between all variables analyzed.
Results: There were 122 patients who underwent 122 IVF cycles with long GnRH agonist protocols. Similar baseline parameters existed between groups. Patients that received r-LH required a lower FSH dose (3207 ± 1300 IU) for stimulation compared to the group that received hMG (4213 ± 1576 IU, P=0.0001). The LH dose was also lower in these patients (1332 ± 587 IU) compared to the patients who received hMG (1938 ± 1110 IU, P=0.0001). The number of days of stimulation did not differ between groups (P=1.0). The group that received r-LH also had statistically higher numbers of oocytes (14.4 ± 6.3) and embryos (7.9 ± 4.8) compared to the hMG group with 11.0 ± 5.3 oocytes and 6.0 ± 3.7 embryos. Pregnancy rates per cycle start were higher for patients in the r-LH group (49%) compared to the hMG group (27%, P=0.025). Patients that received r-LH had higher implantation rates (62%) compared to the hMG group (33%, P=0.001). The r-LH group had a higher trend toward clinical pregnancy rates per cycle start (39%) compared to the hMG group (25%, P=0.065).
Conclusion: r-LH may offer benefits compared to hMG when combined with FSH for ovarian stimulation in long GnRH agonist protocols in good responders. Prospective studies should be undertaken to confirm these results.
Keywords: Human Menopausal Gonadotropins; In Vitro Fertilization; Luteinizing Hormone; Ovarian Stimulation.
Similar articles
-
A comparison of outcomes from in vitro fertilization cycles stimulated with either recombinant luteinizing hormone (LH) or human chorionic gonadotropin acting as an LH analogue delivered as human menopausal gonadotropins, in subjects with good or poor ovarian reserve: a retrospective analysis.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Jan;172:70-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.10.027. Epub 2013 Nov 5. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014. PMID: 24314801
-
Recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and recombinant luteinizing hormone versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone alone during GnRH antagonist ovarian stimulation in patients aged ≥35 years: a randomized controlled trial.Hum Reprod. 2015 May;30(5):1188-95. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev038. Epub 2015 Mar 3. Hum Reprod. 2015. PMID: 25740882 Clinical Trial.
-
The effect of human menopausal gonadotrophin and highly purified, urine-derived follicle stimulating hormone on the outcome of in-vitro fertilization in down-regulated normogonadotrophic women.Hum Reprod. 1996 Jun;11(6):1209-13. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019357. Hum Reprod. 1996. PMID: 8671425 Clinical Trial.
-
The role of gonadotropins in follicular development and their use in ovulation induction protocols for assisted reproduction.Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2000 Jun;5(2):157-67. doi: 10.1080/13625180008500389. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2000. PMID: 10943580 Review.
-
Ovarian Stimulation Protocol in IVF: An Up-to-Date Review of the Literature.Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2016;17(4):303-15. doi: 10.2174/1389201017666160118103147. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2016. PMID: 26775651 Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of Exogenous Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Supplementation on Clinical Pregnancy of Patients Receiving Long-Acting Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist (GnRHa) Cycles: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Int J Womens Health. 2022 Dec 13;14:1691-1700. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S388726. eCollection 2022. Int J Womens Health. 2022. PMID: 36536609 Free PMC article.
-
Luteinizing hormone supplementation in women with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism seeking fertility care: Insights from a narrative review.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 1;13:907249. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.907249. eCollection 2022. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 35979440 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pregnancy confirmed after controlled ovarian stimulation for infertility: A case report.Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Sep 17;100(37):e27140. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027140. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021. PMID: 34664838 Free PMC article.
-
Interplay Between mTOR and Hippo Signaling in the Ovary: Clinical Choice Guidance Between Different Gonadotropin Preparations for Better IVF.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Jul 21;12:702446. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.702446. eCollection 2021. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021. PMID: 34367070 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison between cycles of the same patients when using recombinant luteinizing hormone + recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH), human menopausal gonadotropin + rFSH and rFSH only.Arch Med Sci. 2019 May;15(3):673-679. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2017.72408. Epub 2018 Jan 8. Arch Med Sci. 2019. PMID: 31110533 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Al-Inany HG, Abou-Setta AM, Aboulghar MA, Mansour RT, Serour GI. Efficacy and safety of human menopausal gonadotrophins versus recombinant FSH: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;16(1):81–88. - PubMed
-
- Platteau P, Nyboe Andersen A, Loft A, Smitz J, Danglas P, Devroey P, et al. Highly purified HMG versus recombinant FSH for ovarian stimulation in IVF cycles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17(2):190–198. - PubMed
-
- Coomarasamy A, Afnan M, Cheema D, van der Veen F, Bossuyt PMM, van Wely M, et al. Urinary hMG versus recombinant FSH for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation following an agonist long down-regulation protocol in IVF or ICSI treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(2):310–315. - PubMed
-
- Hill MJ, Levens ED, Levy G, Ryan ME, Csokmay JM, DeCherney AH, et al. The use of recombinant luteinizing hormone in patients undergoing assisted reproductive techniques with advanced reproductive age: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(5):11081114–11081114. e1. - PubMed
-
- Drakakis P, Loutradis D, Kallianidis K, Liapi A, Milingos S, Makrigiannakis A, et al. Small doses of LH activity are needed early in ovarian stimulation for better quality oocytes in IVF-ET. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;121(1):77–80. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources